Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Villa Manor Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Colorado (CO)
  4. Lakewood
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sharon Dehmlow
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I stayed at Villa Manor for about 18 days. Some of the nurses were great and very caring, as we're several of the aides. However, it was difficult to get a nurse to come in at times, and some of the aides seemed preoccupied and in a rush. I agree with others who posted here that they seemed to be short staffed most of the time. In addition, there were far too many times that I pushed the call button and no one came. They instructed me not to use the bathroom without help, but I couldn't get help! At night I would hear patients crying out for help or obviously in pain, and this would go on for a long time. When I asked about it they were very dismissive. Last, the food was just terrible, burnt at times, over salted, and sometimes inedible. They need to overhaul their system!

  • Aaron Garcia
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    as a previous employee of Villa, I can ensure you this facility has a long history of very neglectful care toward the residents. This facility is always critically short staffed to the point that employees and residents are injured very frequently. The management team cares about one thing, staying under budget. The administrator Ms. Michael Johnson, couldn't care less about the residents care. He cares more about his Range rover. The CNA staff work short just about every shift, so showers, oral care, basic daily care is not able to be provided. if you are thinking of placing your loved one in this facility take an in depth tour, without the admissions person directing you to certain areas. talk to the residents that are lucid enough to respond, and look at residents appearance. such as are men shaved and well groomed, does it look like people have been provided oral care recently, does hair looked clean and groomed. then decide if you want your mother, father, sister etc. in this facility. Hope my review can assist you in determining if you place your family member in their care. Good luck, there are a lot of great nursing facilities in the Denver area, Villa isn't one. Don't be fooled by the fancy decor, look at the appearance of the residents. Good luck.

  • Brenda Southerly
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Great staff. Newly remodeled and private rooms.

  • Free Wheelin
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Awesome!

  • Dicky Lolowang
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About Villa Manor Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLife Care Associates Iv Limited Partnership
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 4, 1971 (47 years)
Capacity120
Residents82
Percent Occupied68%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Villa Manor Care Center

Villa Manor Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Colorado Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 2, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

February 12, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Villa Manor Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 20min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
86.4%
86.4%
86.4%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.5%
91.2%
85.2%
85.2%
89.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.7%
50.0%
61.3%
51.5%
48.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.3%
14.8%
12.1%
10.9%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.4%
13.9%
13.2%
23.2%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.8%
5.5%
6.8%
10.2%
14.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.4%
23.9%
13.7%
20.0%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.6%
25.4%
18.3%
14.7%
9.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.7%
3.6%
3.3%
6.6%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7%
3.6%
1.7%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
3.4%
1.7%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

83.2%
85.1%
81.3%
73.9%
75.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.1%
85.5%
85.5%
85.5%
74.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.3%
58.2%
60.3%
61.4%
65.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
52.9%
36.8%
34.4%
26.4%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
2.2%
3.1%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.6%
1.1%
1.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places