Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Apple Rehab Laurel Woods

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Connecticut (CT)
  4. East Haven
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I would rather drop my loved one off at a kennel! AWFUL place. Not only is the cleanliness questionable, but the staff is so annoyed if you need them, its sad. We wont even get into the bookkeeping. Very sad that these places are allowed to charge so much and treat people like you are doing them a favor being there. I wont get into everything because I may have a legal issue on my hands and until this is resolved, I don't want to elaborate...just keep looking for a place if this is the place you think you are going to use...

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Beautiful Site

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

  • ★★★★★ 9 months ago

About Apple Rehab Laurel Woods

General Information

Legal Business NameLaurel Woods Health Care Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 28, 1993 (24 years)
Capacity120
Residents112
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Apple Rehab Laurel Woods

Apple Rehab Laurel Woods
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 6, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

September 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$9,555 fine
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

July 9, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$14,700 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Apple Rehab Laurel Woods require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

85.9%
92.1%
92.1%
92.1%
94.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.9%
57.7%
53.8%
54.0%
45.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.7%
29.0%
27.8%
28.4%
21.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.6%
27.5%
26.9%
22.1%
19.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.2%
11.5%
10.1%
12.6%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.0%
16.8%
26.8%
12.8%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.0%
11.6%
6.0%
7.8%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5%
9.7%
13.4%
12.5%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9%
0.0%
1.2%
2.6%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.2%
1.0%
6.1%
2.1%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
1.0%
3.0%
3.1%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

91.8%
92.7%
85.9%
79.6%
80.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
77.1%
80.2%
80.2%
80.2%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.9%
69.7%
77.8%
73.5%
66.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
5.0%
-
-
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4%
2.9%
1.6%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.9%
3.0%
0.9%
0.8%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places