Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Amberwoods Of Farmington

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Connecticut (CT)
  4. Farmington
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My husband Donald was at Amberwoods in Nov. His care was top notch. The entire staff were a caring crew. I would give an A+ to all.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    5 star - I had the opportunity to see the inside of Amberwoods of Farmington while visiting of friend. It's spotless, modern and no odors. The Staff were extremely helpful and friendly. I would definitely recommend Amberwoods for short term rehab. My friend will be home sooner than both he and his doctor thought......

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I had a relative live at Amberwoods for five months. He was well treated and well cared for. Even though he was very confused, the staff was always patient and kind. The physical therapy got him back on his feet. He was even happy with the food. I would not hesitate to utilize Amberwoods again if the need arises.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I cannot thank the staff at Amberwoods enough. My 34 year old husband was there for 4 months until he passed away and everyone from the director to the housekeeping staff was supportive and compassionate. My husband was treated with the utmost respect and compassion and I fought to keep him there due to the wonderful care he received. Everyone went above and beyond for not only my husband, but also both of our families and all of our friends. Amberwoods was a second home for my infant daughter and we have kept in touch with staff since. I would highly recommend Amberwoods and thank Tammy and her wonderful staff for the exceptional care they provide.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Totally unorganized Management Staff. Snotty, uncaring and fake. Floors are short staffed, Nurses sleep in the Nurses Stations while the Aides are playing games on their cell phones. A patient ringing a bell gets attitude, IF anyone ever bothers to respond. Trays are delivered, no assistance is offered to the patient who is unable to feed themselves, and the trays are picked up, regardless of whether or not the patient has touched the food. No snacks available (the staff steals them and takes them home). No towels, no sheets, no bed sheets, no bed pads and forget about diapers. These poor Seniors are forced to be humiliated and to lay NAKED in their beds and mess themselves. Shower? Keep praying. Theft from patient rooms by the staff, right down to EATING the patient's meals. The STATE needs to STOP giving a head's up to these horrible places before an inspection. If Amber Woods was to EVER get a REAL surprise inspection, they would definitely be shut down. They MAY be following the State's guidelines regarding staffing (staff to patient ratio), but the STAFF needs to actually want to work while they're there. Oh wait, forgot to mention MICE running all over and even climbing into patient's beds. Nice, huh? Amber woods is a place to put a parent that you HATE with all your being. It would not, in my opinion, be suitable for a Dog Resue Facility.

About Amberwoods Of Farmington

General Information

Legal Business NameFarmington Rehab Center, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 13, 1999 (18 years)
Capacity130
Residents113
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Amberwoods Of Farmington

Amberwoods Of Farmington
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 21, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

May 21, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

June 17, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$9,328 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Amberwoods Of Farmington require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
35.0%
35.3%
41.8%
47.5%
45.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.9%
23.9%
23.1%
23.4%
21.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.9%
12.1%
10.9%
10.7%
19.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
32.5%
29.8%
28.6%
32.2%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
1.4%
9.5%
7.4%
9.5%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.5%
6.2%
5.2%
10.9%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
6.6%
3.4%
4.7%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
15.7%
13.8%
7.4%
10.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8%
7.3%
1.0%
1.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3%
1.0%
3.0%
2.8%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
98.5%
98.6%
80.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.1%
92.5%
92.5%
92.5%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.7%
72.6%
79.9%
80.1%
66.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.1%
15.8%
14.3%
17.9%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places