Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Connecticut (CT)
  4. Greenwich
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Gerry Matts
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    My mother lived here for Four years before she passed away. These folks are them most caring, delightful professionals. Mackie, Karen and the crew will give your parents and relatives the best. I can't say thank you enough.

  • Perry Grosser
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Very nice place. Caring staff, courteous administration, decent food. My 58 year old brother-in-law has been there for almost two years and he is very happy. They treat him with dignity and respect, they answer his questions, call me whenever something important has to be discussed, and treat the entire family with respect. The new administration has straightened out some of the issues that existed over a year ago, they have improved the food, the internet access, and the staff training. We are very happy with our families choice to have our relative live there.

  • Tony LoMeli
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    A very nice place. I visited a friends Mom while she was at Greenwich Woods and I was very pleasantly surprised at the cleanliness and level of care people were receiving.

  • Mary Kitchens
    ★★★★★ 12 months ago

    It was Tremendously hard for me to put my oldest brother in the nursing home at 63 young years of age. Greenwich woods excepted him and accommodated all his needs. They were welcoming reassured me and his needs. They were kind hearted very supportive. My brother has been there three months now and he has a roof over his head he has three very good meals and his stomach each day, his clothes are washed he has his medication taken care of there are social activities if he pursues. My one complaint is he's not supposed to go outside by himself. They are giving him everything he needs that I was unable to do because of where I live. I would definitely recommend Greenwich woods to anyone who is an able to take care of their family.

  • Jason Reich
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I visited this facility to attand a Doctor's speech last summer. The place was sparkling clean and the food they served was very decent. The residents and staff attended the speech and it looked to be a place where I would go for short-term rehabilitation.

About Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameGreenwich Woods Rehabilitation LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 24, 1986 (32 years)
Capacity217
Residents181
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation

Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 23, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive each resident enough fluids to keep them healthy and prevent dehydration.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain comfortable and safe temperature levels.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program for mentally-ill and mentally-retarded patients.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

April 29, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.

June 19, 2014 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$12,285 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 10min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.8%
92.7%
92.7%
92.7%
94.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.8%
66.2%
67.2%
68.3%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
52.8%
58.2%
66.1%
63.5%
45.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.7%
22.8%
23.7%
19.4%
21.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.9%
10.9%
20.6%
16.1%
19.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.7%
25.2%
22.6%
23.4%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.5%
11.9%
19.8%
23.5%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5%
5.8%
9.0%
12.9%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8%
4.7%
4.9%
4.7%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
2.4%
2.4%
2.4%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.0%
7.9%
6.0%
7.2%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
4.3%
6.6%
6.3%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.6%
1.3%
1.9%
1.6%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

32.1%
41.9%
46.7%
41.9%
80.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
67.2%
73.5%
73.5%
73.5%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.1%
66.9%
64.5%
64.3%
66.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.7%
16.0%
13.6%
8.5%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
1.5%
3.5%
5.2%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
1.0%
0.6%
0.2%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places