Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Chelsea Place Care Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Connecticut
  3. Hartford Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Ramona Knight
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    This place is the worst health care facility in Hartford, CT. Would not recommend this place to anyone. My brother in law is there he's fallen numer

  • Liz Hendry
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    I have had a family member here since March I wouldn't recommend this place to anyone unless it was your absolute last option. There is absolutely NO communication with family members (I am conservator of body for this family member), and no matter how many times we confront them about this nothing ever changes. They had a rat trap in my family members room once, and nurses never seem to have any answers for us when we call with questions about their care.

  • sharon
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    DISGUSTING, FILTHY, UNSANITARY, UNHEALTHY! When you first walk in you cannot tell, BUT, go look around closer. Check the room etc where you have someone there staying!! Def reporting them to board of health and anyone else I can find to report them to! I wish I could post the pictures of this totally disgusting dirty place on here! Gues I will have to post on social media public

  • MarieElena Mathena
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    My son says it is a the worse place ever. The website pictures are a lie. Read the other reviews rated one star. They are right. Terrible place wouldn't put a dog there.

  • nancy addona
    ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    my stay was about a month ago I won't rate it I won't send my worst enemy there. I stayed on Lorraine st in Hartford it's like living in a dungon. Michael G your right. It's the worst place where did they come up with the pictures it's all bullshit. If I had stayed any longer I would have died I went in to gain weight cause I have cancer and instead I lost more weight. One thing I can say there were 3 nurses that were great the best. the rest of them it was a pay check. anyway I will never recommend that place to no one. Yes my name is Nancy Addona & I'm from waterbury I had to rate one star or it would not let me post.

About Chelsea Place Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameChelsea Place Care Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1983 (37 years)
Capacity234
Residents233
Percent Occupied100%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Chelsea Place Care Center

Chelsea Place Care Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 13, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.

February 2, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide special eating equipment and utensils for each resident who needs them.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive each resident enough fluids to keep them healthy and prevent dehydration.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.

November 10, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Chelsea Place Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
1hr 55min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
45min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
3hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

88.4%
93.3%
93.3%
93.3%
95.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.1%
77.1%
76.3%
73.0%
94.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
11.9%
10.2%
8.1%
9.6%
45.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.0%
32.5%
29.3%
29.3%
20.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
4.5%
2.3%
3.4%
2.1%
18.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.5%
17.8%
20.0%
19.8%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.8%
8.1%
6.9%
5.5%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5%
3.3%
2.3%
2.4%
6.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.4%
5.9%
5.2%
3.5%
4.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.2%
2.3%
1.4%
1.3%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.9%
7.7%
5.4%
5.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
1.4%
0.5%
0.5%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
0.5%
0.0%
0.9%
3.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

66.0%
76.5%
72.1%
69.1%
81.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
69.0%
50.6%
50.6%
50.6%
80.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.8%
75.0%
83.9%
-
68.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
16.3%
12.8%
12.5%
22.2%
12.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.3%
5.1%
5.4%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places