Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Apple Rehab Coccomo

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Connecticut
  3. Meriden Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Nels Nelson
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    If I could give negative star I would. Day 1 clothes were stolen and wrong medication . Then took blood pressure itwas 169 over 90... um way to high, nurses never came back nor was he monitored. Nurses there are clueless. DO NOT LEAVE YOUR LOVED ONE THERE!!!!!!!

  • Michelle Mac
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother has been placed there with dementia. It was a difficult decision, but due to the circumstances it was the first available facility. The majority of the staff is good. However there is a strong lack of communication amongst the staff with the family. My mother was taken to an a appointment without my knowledge. The only reason I found out was due to my mother calling me terrified. Also there is nobody available after hours to answer the phones to assist people. Prime example, my mother called me tonight to say another resident was in her room causing a disturbance. This has happened numerous times. My mother rings the nurses bell but yet nobody responds. I call the main number, and shockingly nobody answers the phone. Its getting quite tiring. After reading reviews...apparently coccomo is adequate for short term, however not for long term placement.

  • S Wild
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Clean and organized home. Attentive and Caring staff helped the transition a bit "easier". Happy with our decision in this hard time.

  • G Lee
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    We had a few nursing homes recommended to us when my mother was in the hospital. After trying others, we're very glad she landed here. Being in this situation is nerve wracking to say the least and the people at Coccomo made it bearable for us. The people here care very much for the residents. The rooms are nice too.

  • Krista Caouette
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Best staff ever. No matter what position, nursing to rehab to the kitchen to housekeeping, were all amazing!!!! Highly recommend Apple Rehab Coccomo!

About Apple Rehab Coccomo

General Information

Legal Business NameMeriden Health Care Center Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 17, 1991 (29 years)
Capacity100
Residents89
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Apple Rehab Coccomo

Apple Rehab Coccomo was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 18, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Apple Rehab Coccomo require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 60min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.3%
92.3%
92.3%
92.3%
95.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.9%
98.6%
98.5%
97.0%
94.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
56.7%
46.7%
59.4%
50.0%
45.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.0%
28.1%
27.0%
32.8%
20.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.2%
30.8%
23.0%
22.6%
18.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.7%
9.1%
8.2%
6.5%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.9%
23.8%
9.7%
20.6%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.0%
17.5%
10.9%
7.0%
6.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.4%
13.1%
9.3%
3.5%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.2%
7.0%
8.0%
1.9%
4.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7%
0.0%
4.6%
6.1%
3.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
1.3%
1.1%
0.0%
1.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

78.2%
80.3%
78.1%
81.5%
81.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.8%
83.8%
83.8%
83.8%
80.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.4%
70.0%
68.3%
72.3%
68.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
27.3%
15.2%
12.5%
17.0%
12.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places