Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Miller Memorial Community

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Connecticut
  3. Meriden Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • be S
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This place is completely outdated. There's carpet throughout, stained with God knows what. Residents parked in the hallways in their wheelchairs against the walls, sleeping. Never any staff to be found, or if they are they're chatting w one another. Food selection is terrible. Lighting is dark. These poor people probably have no idea the conditions they are living in. It's a wonder how this place passes inspection..completely disgusting and should be shut down. Doesn't even deserve the 1 star.

  • Jenny Martinez
    ★★★★★ a year ago

  • Harry Jael
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

  • Isabel Perez
    ★★★★★ a year ago

  • Latisha Soto-Morris
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

About Miller Memorial Community

General Information

Legal Business NameMiller Memorial Community, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1980 (40 years)
Capacity90
Residents68
Percent Occupied76%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Miller Memorial Community

Miller Memorial Community was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 17, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$16,450 fine

October 22, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$9,783 fine

July 1, 2015 - 5 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,170 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Miller Memorial Community require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 45min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
43.5%
52.4%
50.0%
50.0%
45.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.3%
29.6%
20.0%
17.6%
20.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
36.1%
31.4%
27.1%
17.7%
18.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.9%
17.7%
14.5%
17.9%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.4%
27.1%
23.9%
20.9%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.2%
9.5%
12.9%
5.4%
6.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8%
8.2%
4.7%
6.4%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.8%
7.0%
2.6%
3.1%
4.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.5%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.1%
3.2%
8.1%
7.1%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
4.8%
4.8%
5.3%
3.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
2.2%
1.1%
0.0%
1.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.2%
94.3%
94.3%
93.7%
81.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.1%
86.8%
87.3%
87.3%
80.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.2%
77.6%
74.8%
67.1%
68.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
12.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
1.9%
3.1%
1.5%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places