Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cassena Care At Stamford

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Connecticut (CT)
  4. Stamford
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

About Cassena Care At Stamford

General Information

Legal Business NameStamford Acquisition I LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity156
Residents132
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cassena Care At Stamford

Cassena Care At Stamford
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 26, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

April 5, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

November 5, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrevent a loss in range of motion among residents who entered the nursing home with a full range of motion, unless it is unavoidable due to residentís clinical condition.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

January 7, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$7,410 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive each resident enough fluids to keep them healthy and prevent dehydration.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cassena Care At Stamford require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.3%
96.2%
96.2%
96.2%
94.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
87.6%
94.6%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
37.0%
38.8%
49.1%
41.3%
45.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.9%
14.5%
11.5%
9.9%
21.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.7%
25.4%
42.4%
14.4%
19.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.4%
9.9%
9.1%
9.4%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.3%
29.4%
35.9%
22.3%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3%
0.9%
4.8%
1.6%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9%
7.4%
5.4%
7.4%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.3%
7.1%
3.6%
5.1%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.3%
0.8%
0.0%
1.9%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
3.2%
2.7%
2.7%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.6%
0.7%
1.2%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.0%
88.4%
73.9%
60.9%
80.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.7%
83.3%
83.3%
83.3%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.1%
65.6%
70.5%
70.6%
66.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
6.2%
3.8%
13.3%
17.4%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places