Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Villa At Stamford, The

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Connecticut (CT)
  4. Stamford
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a week ago

    I was visiting my best friend's mother,who is 90 plus years old woman with dementia who is now a resident at The Villa...i would like to know,where are those nice cheerful rooms you show in the photos? What i saw and experienced was quite the opposite...dingy and dirty dining areas,residents crowded together,those who had trouble eating on their own,without assistance..i was reprimanded several times by the staff, for wheeling my friend's mother,into other areas,in search for a decent place to sit together...one aide yelled at my friend for changing her mind about using the bathroom! She has dementia!! I understand renovations will be happening soon...where will these residents be during this time?..i hope not breathing in paint fumes and sheetrock dust!!..i understand that with the past and now current political situation,nursing facilities always have suffered..not enough money or staff..i get that..but please don't play on the emotions of families,who are already stressed out, by providing false evidence with pretty photos and complimentary text....that is really unfair and deceitful. Hopefully my friend's mother will be relocated..as for the long-term residents,my heart goes out to them and their families.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My Father was in this facility for almost 2 months after he fell and needed surgery to repair his hip and his wrist. My family's experience was excellent. The people here were so helpful and kind every step of the way. The rehabilitation department got him back on his feet and walking within a week of his arrival which was no easy task. The physical therapy girls that worked with Dad were motivating and also firm when Dad was being difficult. I hope my family does not have to go though something like this again but God forbid we do, I will be returning here.

  • ★★★★★ a week ago

    Great experience. Staff truly cares about each resident.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My family member was at the facility for rehab for few months. We had a great experience, from beautiful renovations, great staff and cleanliness.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I can't believe the pictures they show really see what's going on on the inside of this facility is a shame how are they making you think this is the best place to have your family members in and look at what do I see is disgusting they should be ashamed of themselves????? security no receptionist type of safety no cameras the showers are disgusting.anyone who could just walk in without getting stopped who in the hell will have one of their loved ones to be in safe

About Villa At Stamford, The

General Information

Legal Business NameSmith House Operating LLC
Ownership TypeGovernment - City/County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity128
Residents108
Percent Occupied84%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Villa At Stamford, The

Villa At Stamford, The
was reviewed by to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 14, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for each resident in a way that maintains or improves their quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

May 21, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$2,500 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Villa At Stamford, The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
53.6%
54.2%
42.9%
42.9%
45.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.3%
17.0%
17.0%
15.3%
21.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
8.3%
27.9%
12.1%
12.8%
19.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.8%
19.8%
16.9%
15.2%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.1%
21.9%
22.7%
18.8%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3%
5.5%
3.6%
0.0%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
10.2%
14.0%
14.4%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6%
5.4%
11.3%
10.8%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.1%
0.0%
3.2%
4.2%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1%
2.3%
2.2%
1.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2%
2.3%
2.1%
2.0%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
1.1%
0.7%
2.2%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.8%
80.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.5%
91.4%
91.4%
91.4%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.8%
61.2%
47.0%
57.8%
66.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.6%
17.5%
13.7%
9.8%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
4.8%
1.9%
1.8%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places