Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cheshire House Health Care Fac

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Connecticut
  3. Waterbury Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Cathie Pragano
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    My mother in law was there for just 5 days before passing. During this time they offered nothing but compassion for her and for us. A special thank you to Nicole for your compassion and excellent care. Thank you all.

  • Susan Z
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My Mom was a resident at Cheshire House (briefly) in October & November of 2018. If I could give no stars I would. I cannot emphasize how unhappy and disgusted my family & I were with the "care" that our Mom was (not) given. Someone from our family visited her daily so we saw first hand how she was being treated. This is why we found another nursing home for her ~ and they took care of her the way that they should! At Cheshire House, our Mom was ignored, not given the nutrition that we were told she was being given, not being given the therapy we were told she was being given, she was put in someone else's clothes and the staff argued that they were her clothes, I was ignored (as was my sister) when I went to the nurses station (on several occasions) & when my Mom needed to be changed was very rudely told "ya we heard ~ we will be there when we can". The social worker was more interested in kicking our mother out of Cheshire House and sending her back to her apartment (which she told me was "great news" but yet our Mom couldn't even stand up on her own) than she was in trying to help us find the proper care plan for an elderly woman who was in severe pain and not being cared for. And the doctors were even worse. They never once even spoke to us! We tried in vain to reach someone in charge at Cheshire House to voice these concerns and report these employees but we got absolutely nowhere. We do not recommend Cheshire House by any means.

  • Mickey Albini
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    If I could give 0 stars I would. My father-in-law fell, his head went through the wall...they claim that they found him at 4:30 am but never notified the family and never dispatched an ambulance and put him back to bed for 5 hours where he had 5 seizures and 2 brain bleeds...RIP to my father-in-law.

  • Tina
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    The staff is loving and caring! I know my mom is in good hands here.

  • Arelis Polanco
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

About Cheshire House Health Care Fac

General Information

Legal Business NameCheshire House LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1992 (28 years)
Capacity73
Residents70
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cheshire House Health Care Fac

Cheshire House Health Care Fac was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 9, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cheshire House Health Care Fac require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 15min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 25min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
45.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.0%
27.9%
25.0%
20.5%
20.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
6.5%
10.7%
19.7%
20.3%
18.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.3%
17.8%
20.0%
14.6%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.1%
2.3%
11.4%
11.9%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.6%
26.7%
20.0%
8.5%
6.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7%
0.0%
2.2%
2.7%
4.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.9%
2.2%
4.8%
4.1%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.9%
8.9%
6.0%
8.5%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.0%
8.7%
7.8%
2.0%
3.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
3.5%
2.7%
1.6%
1.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

74.4%
95.7%
96.7%
97.1%
81.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.9%
95.2%
95.2%
95.2%
80.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.4%
71.9%
65.4%
57.2%
68.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
18.1%
11.2%
14.0%
12.0%
12.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.7%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places