Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regalcare At Waterbury

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Connecticut (CT)
  4. Waterbury
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Anna Holland
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    No stars are deserved to rate this place. I had a family member who when he lived on his own never went to the hospital for his breathing. Tell me why he went here and was found unresponsive 3 times he had to be incubated. And now he is gone. Long story short if you want your family member to live don't send them here. We now lost a very loving family member and I don't have any doubt it was this place to blame.

About Regalcare At Waterbury

General Information

Legal Business NameRegalcare At Waterbury LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 6, 1972 (45 years)
Capacity120
Residents105
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regalcare At Waterbury

Regalcare At Waterbury
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 7, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

September 25, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regalcare At Waterbury require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 10min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.0%
77.4%
77.4%
77.4%
94.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.0%
80.0%
74.7%
72.4%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
13.0%
18.5%
17.9%
27.8%
45.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.8%
32.9%
34.1%
36.2%
21.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
6.5%
5.1%
4.8%
11.7%
19.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.5%
7.5%
7.2%
6.0%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.7%
3.0%
12.1%
9.1%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.1%
7.8%
10.3%
8.6%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7%
7.2%
9.3%
3.4%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.6%
4.1%
5.4%
3.8%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.9%
3.7%
4.9%
3.8%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4%
1.2%
1.2%
0.0%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.1%
1.2%
2.3%
2.3%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3%
3.1%
5.4%
1.1%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

34.1%
44.3%
29.2%
28.1%
80.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
59.6%
54.7%
54.7%
54.7%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
21.4%
13.7%
12.5%
17.3%
66.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
36.4%
35.6%
31.9%
40.2%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places