Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regalcare At Waterbury

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Connecticut
  3. Waterbury Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Jeremiah Coopersmith
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Regalcare really did a great job helping my Dad after his surgery. Waterbury Hospital recommended this place and we are glad they did. He was nervous, we were all nervous but he bounced back faster than any of us even expected. The nurses were caring, the administrator was present and really followed up! The rehab was fantastic, Dad actually said he was ENJOYING his time there! We never expected to hear that. I would highly recommend this place to anyone!

  • Joesh Zurotis
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Great place! They really have taken great care of my father over the times that he had been here. I would recommend RegalCare to anyone who is in need of going to a facility. They're only getting better, at RegalCare!

  • Glorimar Torres
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    My mother was placed here after her surgery... Regal care's staff was very unprofessional, treated her very poorly, bullied by most of the staff. She called me crying multiple times. These people are patients/HUMANS... you chose your job, if you can't handle it, than please quit. I wish I can give 0 stars. Not only was she treated very badly her incision got infected, she also has a horrible rash all over her body. Please don't leave your loved ones here! THEY DO NOT CARE!

  • LaGatita103
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Most rudest and unprofessional. One nurse and one aide but it sucks that for two rude ghetto ones I will never set foot in this place. First impression counts keep that in mind the people don't choose the job for you. You choose this career path so be a bit more caring and when addressing others be professional about it.

  • D Morr
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Our 93 year old grandfather just spent 5 weeks here for rehab after a fall. Nursing care on East 1 unit was wonderful on all shifts. Very caring staff that treats residents like family members. Cannot say enough great things about the Rehab staff, they go above and beyond to help the patients succeed. He enjoyed socializing and eating in DR with other residents and dietary staff very accomodating to many special requests of residents. Recreation programs especially Frankie's Truck visit was also a highlight. He is back on his feet, free of pain and enjoying life again thanks to the great care he received. Your hardwork is so appreciated and we are so grateful for all you did for our grandfather!

About Regalcare At Waterbury

General Information

Legal Business NameRegalcare At Waterbury LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 6, 1972 (47 years)
Capacity120
Residents92
Percent Occupied77%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regalcare At Waterbury

* Rating not displayedOverall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Rating not displayedStaff Rating
* Rating not displayedRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 28, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive the right treatment and services to residents who display physical or psychosocial problems adapting to changes in circumstances.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regalcare At Waterbury require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

77.4%
92.6%
92.6%
92.6%
95.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.2%
67.1%
84.8%
79.5%
94.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
22.2%
25.6%
18.2%
17.6%
45.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.5%
36.9%
31.6%
37.0%
20.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.1%
6.6%
13.3%
8.7%
18.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
0.0%
1.6%
5.1%
7.9%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.2%
8.8%
23.1%
12.1%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1%
1.2%
2.6%
1.2%
6.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
0.0%
2.6%
9.1%
4.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
10.0%
4.5%
0.0%
1.1%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
3.7%
2.6%
5.1%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.1%
1.2%
0.0%
1.2%
3.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
1.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

40.5%
66.7%
77.9%
73.9%
81.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
54.7%
81.9%
81.9%
81.9%
80.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
41.7%
50.0%
65.5%
76.9%
68.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
43.7%
31.2%
16.4%
12.0%
12.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.3%
2.5%
2.6%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.5%
1.4%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places