Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Hughes Health And Rehabilitation

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Connecticut
  3. West Hartford Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Mapo Persons
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Visited my aunt there today. I live In AZ so this is the first Time Ive seen her since she moved there. It was a cozy and warm atmosphere . The staff was very friendly and caring. I last saw my aunt 3 years ago at my mothers funeral and although her dementia has progressed , she physically looked better than she did then. She was happy to show us around and was quite adept with her walker.

  • Mary Jane Giardi
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    No diagnosis of problem

  • Molly M
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Do not send your loved one here. The facility is old and out dated. Cleanliness is not a priority. The equipment, like wheel chairs, are falling apart. Your loved one will be forgotten if you do not stay on top of Hughes. Multiple times, they forgot to take my mother in law to the bathroom in the morning! Would give negative stars if it was possible.

  • Donna Bobb
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Employees ignore the patients. Dont send your love ones to this facility!!!

  • Cristina Balser
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

About Hughes Health And Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameHughes Health & Rehabilitation, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity170
Residents143
Percent Occupied84%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Hughes Health And Rehabilitation

Hughes Health And Rehabilitation was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Hughes Health And Rehabilitation has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Hughes Health And Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.2%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
95.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
45.2%
39.4%
38.7%
38.7%
45.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.2%
9.6%
7.3%
6.9%
20.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.7%
13.7%
23.9%
20.7%
18.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
1.8%
4.3%
3.6%
3.4%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.9%
7.8%
14.3%
7.6%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.3%
10.5%
12.4%
9.8%
6.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3%
3.3%
3.5%
1.2%
4.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.8%
2.6%
0.8%
3.0%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
0.8%
5.0%
4.1%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
0.8%
1.7%
4.0%
3.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5%
0.0%
0.6%
0.5%
1.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.7%
98.2%
97.5%
98.7%
81.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.1%
93.4%
93.4%
93.4%
80.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.7%
61.3%
61.6%
55.1%
68.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.8%
12.4%
8.8%
9.5%
12.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2.2%
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
0.5%
0.4%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places