Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Hughes Health And Rehabilitation

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Connecticut (CT)
  4. West Hartford
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Visited my aunt there today. I live In AZ so this is the first Time Ive seen her since she moved there. It was a cozy and warm atmosphere . The staff was very friendly and caring. I last saw my aunt 3 years ago at my mothers funeral and although her dementia has progressed , she physically looked better than she did then. She was happy to show us around and was quite adept with her walker.

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Employees ignore the patients. Dont send your love ones to this facility!!!

  • ★★★★★ 7 years ago

    When my aunt was in an out of state skilled nursing facility, our family decided to move her closer to family in Connecticut. The care and caring that she received at The Hughes was amazing. Because she came from another facility, we were able to compare quality of care, staffing, and capability of the caregivers. Our only regret was that we did not move her sooner.

  • ★★★★★ 7 years ago

    I have spent 35 years in the long term care business. My experience at Hughes on behalf of my father (patient) and my entire family exceeded my expectations for many reasons. The most important reason was the hands on care and rehabilitation he received. I found the nursing staff to be responsive and, in fact, on most days, able to anticipate his needs. The rehabilitation staff was able to take an 88 year old gentlemen with serious leg problems to go through a course of therapy that allowed him to walk out two weeks after admission. My visits were often on different shifts on different days. I was always greeted with a smile and a verbal acknowledgement, whether it was a member of the nursing staff, a housekeeper, or the office staff. I am often asked to recommend health care facilities for friends and relatives. I will enthusiastically recommend Hughes in the future.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

About Hughes Health And Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameHughes Health & Rehabilitation, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity170
Residents143
Percent Occupied84%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Hughes Health And Rehabilitation

Hughes Health And Rehabilitation
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 25, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

August 6, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Hughes Health And Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.2%
99.2%
99.2%
99.2%
94.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.2%
45.5%
44.2%
34.4%
45.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.5%
12.2%
12.0%
11.7%
21.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.7%
13.3%
20.9%
21.8%
19.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
1.8%
1.0%
1.9%
2.7%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.7%
19.4%
20.4%
11.8%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.6%
2.2%
1.8%
2.7%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2%
3.4%
3.3%
5.7%
6.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.6%
5.5%
2.5%
8.5%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8%
3.4%
0.0%
3.3%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
1.7%
1.7%
1.6%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.0%
3.0%
2.1%
0.6%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.9%
92.8%
90.6%
93.3%
80.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.0%
88.1%
88.1%
88.1%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.0%
63.5%
70.6%
62.2%
66.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.8%
14.0%
10.2%
5.5%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
2.1%
1.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
0.5%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places