Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cadia Rehabilitation Silverside

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Delaware (DE)
  4. Wilmington
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My husband has been at Cadia for more than a month and unlike others who complained he had a great experience. Good PT and OT. Friendly staff and nurses or aids always came when he rang his buzzer. A few times it was like maybe 5 or 10 minutes but most of the time was far more prompt. He is finally coming home next week. Cadia did a home assessment with my husband in our home and the suggestions and recommendations were fantastic would go back again if we ever needed this kind of service. Must mention that the speech therapist is wonderful and helped my husband learn to eat real food again.

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Great experience! Staff is attentive and caring. Nurses show true compassion. MD and NP were fantastic, all concerns addressed. Would recommend this nursing facility to anyone in need of post acute care! Best in DE.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My sister was a patient here. The therapy staff appear to be competent, but the patient care was bad and the management appears to be poor, My sister reported having to wait over two hours for assistance to visit the toilet. Her pain medication was not delivered on time. Also security is very poor. I arrived to take her to a doctor's appointment slightly before 8 am. The front door was unlocked, but there was no one in reception. Anyone could walk in or out. Also the staff is very lax about wearing IDs, so it is impossible to tell who is an employee. My sister was having trouble eating and on one appeared to be monitoring her calorie intake or insuring that she remained hydrated. The patient care other than the actual rehab function is unacceptable.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    this place is awesome. Very clean and the staff helpful and friendly. I recommend it to anyone needing rehabilitation or long term care.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Don't let a beefed up description and fancy pictures cloud your judgement. The overnight staff are rude and lazy. Their "food" is terribly inedible. They don't care if the residents eat it or not. My mother went all day with NOTHING but a pack of saltine crackers. Communication is appalling! They don't keep you updated. They conveniently make sure they come A DAY LATE to tell you that you've missed an appointment. If you're on medication you're lucky to get it when you need it. If you buzz for a nurse, an aid will come in and turn your light off and tell you that they're going to get your nurse. They might not show up for 6 hours though. Some of the employees ARE nice and helpful. But not enough.. This place needs a LOT of work.

About Cadia Rehabilitation Silverside

General Information

Legal Business NameOnix Silverside LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 5, 2012 (5 years)
Capacity120
Residents102
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cadia Rehabilitation Silverside

Cadia Rehabilitation Silverside
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Delaware Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 18, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

January 29, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive each resident enough fluids to keep them healthy and prevent dehydration.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cadia Rehabilitation Silverside require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
97.6%
97.6%
97.6%
96.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.7%
93.2%
94.5%
94.8%
96.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
50.0%
-
50.0%
50.0%
48.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.0%
25.4%
29.6%
34.3%
25.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
43.5%
28.5%
20.8%
33.6%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.2%
14.3%
14.3%
14.9%
13.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.4%
27.9%
17.9%
12.1%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
22.3%
10.8%
20.1%
18.2%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
2.9%
2.7%
5.3%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9%
3.6%
6.9%
6.8%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.4%
7.6%
6.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.2%
11.6%
6.8%
3.9%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8%
4.1%
2.7%
2.6%
3.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
3.8%
4.8%
3.5%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

88.1%
92.8%
93.9%
92.9%
85.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.7%
93.3%
93.3%
93.3%
85.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.5%
77.2%
78.8%
77.8%
70.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.8%
21.8%
28.8%
25.6%
13.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
1.2%
2.6%
1.4%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016DE
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places