Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Royal Care Of Avon Park

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Avon Park Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Coleen Mcdonald
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Moved my father here from The Palms of Sebring. It is like night and day. What a difference. The care he has received in the first few hours far surpassed what he experienced at the Palms in 48 hours. The attention to dad as well as the atmosphere is so much better here.

  • Patrick Fitzgerald
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I feel the need to express my personal opinion of Royal Care Rehabilitation. My experience has been wonderful, fantastic, to be here at Royal Care. Unbeknownst to me in the beginning of choosing a facility, had nothing to compare to, being new in the area. I spoke with Ms. Angel Wiggins of administrations when I knew of my upcoming surgery and the care I would need afterwards. She was spot on with her outline of care I would receive, I cannot thank anyone specific, every one is better than the other, fantastic staff. From their physical therapist/s Christian and Joel whom I was assigned to are amazing in getting me back for general mobilization to go home sooner rather than later. The skilled nurses are absolutely on the same page during each of their shifts, medicine and medical appointments are documented where I do not have to worry about everything all the time. The daily services from house keeping and kitchen are far superior to make sure nutritionist is involved in balanced meals I receive and the cleanness of my room which is definitely a part of my particular issues. Thank you Royal Care. I would absolutely refer this facility to anyone in need of special skilled nursing care.

  • Steve Hite
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    these people are wonderful, some of the facilities are older and sometimes newer but all are well kept food is good, None of this would mean anything without the staff, and they are wonderful. they are all about the guests

  • James Wynn
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I wish i could sue for how they treated my mother in law very horrible place poor staff unclean they wouldn't give my mom inlaw her diabetes meds nor did she see a doctor once for her wounds we had to pull her out of there because her wound wasnt being looked after and it may be infected she stayed a week and that was a week to long please dont use this place as they should be shut down

  • Christine Corwin
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Do not fall for their lies about being 5 star. I have been here for only 4 days and it has been one nightmare after another. I have to keep my cell on incase i have to call 911 because my oxygen machine keeps stopping and the nurse refuses to come. Please do not put your loved one here.

About Royal Care Of Avon Park

General Information

Legal Business NameAvon Park Royal Holdings LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1993 (26 years)
Capacity90
Residents76
Percent Occupied84%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Royal Care Of Avon Park

Royal Care Of Avon Park was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 7, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Royal Care Of Avon Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.5%
97.1%
97.1%
97.1%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
65.4%
75.0%
59.1%
82.6%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.6%
24.6%
28.1%
24.5%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.2%
11.6%
15.3%
14.1%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.6%
17.9%
7.8%
2.3%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.4%
12.3%
5.3%
3.8%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.2%
5.1%
5.0%
0.0%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2%
1.9%
3.8%
2.0%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.0%
5.6%
13.3%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.2%
3.3%
1.6%
0.0%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
4.9%
4.8%
5.2%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7%
1.6%
1.6%
1.7%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.2%
97.5%
95.8%
92.2%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.6%
92.4%
92.4%
92.4%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.0%
62.8%
67.1%
73.1%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.0%
9.1%
6.9%
7.2%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
0.0%
1.2%
1.1%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places