Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Florida (FL)
  4. Boca Raton
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    The aides are underpaid and overworked; thus, vengeful, cruel, ridiculous, and they helped kill my mother by overdosing her with medicine for constipation then allowing her to stagnate in her bed (even though she was able, with her one useful hand, to over and over again PRESS THE BUTTON FOR HELP) for hours and hours and hours in her own fecal material. Because she was paralyzed on one side from a stroke, she had no way to call on the phone for me to come rescue her. The time was 12midnight. The job of an aide is profoundly difficult, so I blame the establishment, the low pay, and the attitudes of they who take on jobs in which they take their personal problems out on vulnerable patients.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    If you're reading this review it means that you're probably looking for the best place for your elderly mother or father. You have also, most likely, discovered that this place keeps coming up as the best rehab facility in Boca Raton. Well it is... The best of the worst! The OT & PT therapists are decent but they're only going to be seeing your loved one for just a fraction of their otherwise fairly miserable day. They will be at the mercy of the aides who, for the most part, are there just to collect a paycheck. Keep in mind that the really good aides go on to better paying jobs so that leaves the bottom of the barrel. And there aren't even enough of them to answer the call light in a timely fashion. Imagine having to go to the bathroom, & no one shows up for 20 minutes. If you need anything else you could be waiting even longer. And then there's the food. Who knew that kosher food could taste that awful! If your loved one is not a diabetic & you know just how bad artificial sweeteners are for you stay away from the desserts or anything else that calls for real sugar. Their attitude is one size fits all. I also had the misfortune of having to speak with Gilda the director of the facility because 2 days after my mom arrived her necklace was stolen. Gilda was extremely defensive & claims that nothing has ever been stolen & the necklace was probably lost in the laundry. My mother was there for 4 weeks & by the time she left she was bordering on depression & had lost a lot of weight because she could barely eat any of the meals there. I truly feel bad for anyone who has to make a decision as to which rehab to go to because this is the best that Boca has to offer.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Dignity, skill and compassion...that's the care my dear mother received at Regents Park Boca Raton. The staff is attentive and professional. They always involved the family in the resident's care. Everyone knew her name. When your loved one needs skilled nursing care, this is the place to go. I recommend them very highly.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I was a patient at Regent Park of Boca Raton from Aug. 24 to Sept. 24, 2015. Over the past few years I spent time at two other Rehab facilities. Regent Park stood head and shoulders above the others. If you have to spend time in rehabilitation, you cannot do better than Regent Park. The personnel are all very qualified, very caring and compassionate. Although everybody at Regent was great, I especially want to mention Noah, who gave me a wonderful orientation when I first arrived, Nora, my night gal, Bobbie, my pill gal, the wound girl and Gene, who seemed to be all over the place, whenever I needed him. After my month at Regent, I feel like a new man. I never really believed in Physical or Occupational therapy, but Regent Park changed my mind. Last but not least, the food and my room (private) could not have been better. Arthur Miller

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I want to thank all of the wonderful staff at B-Wing of Regents Park for the loving and caring attitude that was shown toward me during my six week stay. The nurses and aides were very professional and sensitive to my needs. I made great progress in rehab due to the highly skillful therapist who treated me. The continuous daily encouragement together with an exceptional Plan of care restored me to a functional level that allowed me to safely return home. Thank you all for your dedication and care.

About Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameRegents Park, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 18, 1984 (33 years)
Capacity180
Residents156
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 30, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain comfortable and safe temperature levels.

July 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.0%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.6%
93.8%
85.3%
88.2%
52.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.7%
29.3%
28.4%
25.6%
27.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.2%
24.3%
6.7%
10.7%
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.0%
15.2%
16.3%
20.2%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.1%
6.4%
2.5%
2.4%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.0%
2.2%
1.0%
0.9%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.9%
7.1%
4.1%
11.0%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.3%
14.4%
14.9%
9.3%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.1%
4.4%
9.7%
6.9%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
3.0%
0.0%
3.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
1.9%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.8%
99.1%
97.8%
98.6%
88.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.4%
96.5%
96.5%
96.5%
85.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.0%
62.4%
63.8%
70.2%
64.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.6%
9.1%
8.9%
7.3%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2%
4.3%
3.2%
2.7%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.5%
1.1%
1.4%
1.2%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places