Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Boca Raton Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Accessible HomeHealthCarePB
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    We have been providing home care services to some patients who have been discharged from Regents Park. Every single one of them has told our nurses and therapists how great their experience was at the facility. It's always nice to hear great things from patients on their experiences at rehab/hospital facilities. Great job Regents Park!! We look forward to providing home care services to more of your extremely happy patients!! -Accessible Home Health Care of Palm Beach

  • Scottness Monster
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Working in the elder care community, I have been into many skilled nursing facilities and am also very aware of reputation. In a tough business, Regents Park stands out as among the best. They are known for a higher quality of care and an attention to detail which surpasses other facilities. Their staff is generally kind and supportive of families in a difficult time.

  • Judy McKnight
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Horrible customer service; no return calls; no action. No empathy; only staff passing calls around departments - nurses station, admissions, social servIces, activities - back and forth and back and forth. In spite of being told the issue was fixed (while I was actually waiting on the phone), it is not fixed. Been calling everyday for two weeks with the exact same issue. If you are from out of town, you do NOT want your loved one to be in Regents Park Boca Raton. This is a continued bad experience, plus added more stress to an already difficult situation.

  • ERIC RAHN
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    The staff at Regent Park are the best. Have both parents there. The staff is kind, compassionate and caring. Mom's quality of life has thrive d since living there. See was on death's doorstep a year ago and now doing fantastic. They nursed her back to good health!

  • Marilyn S. Brilliant, RN
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    After much research put into where my father would go for short-term rehab after his recent hospitalization, I chose Regents Park Boca and what an incredible choice I made. The excellent personal care and respect shown towards my father was evident from day 1. The staff at Regents Park is incredible! His rehab was personalized to his needs and staff always kept me updated and always part of the team. My father is now in long term care and I couldn't be happier or more secure with the care he is receiving. There are activities all day long and the Activities staff are just wonderful. I could go on and on with praise. As an RN, I am very critical. Nothing is perfect, but it is very obvious that the staff at Regents Park Boca strive for excellence. A wonderful place!

About Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameRegents Park, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 18, 1984 (35 years)
Capacity180
Residents155
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 20, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that special or therapeutic diets are ordered by the attending doctor.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regents Park Nursing & Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 40min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.5%
74.3%
81.1%
71.9%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.4%
22.2%
21.1%
18.8%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
12.1%
7.6%
11.6%
15.3%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.9%
17.6%
15.2%
15.2%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.6%
3.5%
5.8%
4.9%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.2%
6.9%
8.7%
8.2%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2%
4.7%
0.8%
0.8%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.6%
11.1%
15.0%
6.2%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
7.4%
4.2%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
2.0%
1.9%
3.1%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
0.0%
1.9%
2.0%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.5%
1.3%
0.4%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.8%
97.4%
99.0%
96.1%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.5%
90.6%
90.6%
90.6%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.4%
77.0%
80.8%
80.2%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.4%
7.1%
5.5%
5.7%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.3%
2.1%
1.4%
0.9%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
0.7%
0.5%
0.2%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places