Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Heritage Park Care And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Florida (FL)
  4. Bradenton
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • David Flanary
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I have worked for this facility for over 3 years. I decided to work for this company and group of people because of their dedication and compassion in caring for others. We have tenured management, therapy staff, nurses and most importantly certified nursing assistants with years of experience. If you any doubt or apprehension in deciding to bring your loved one here, stop by and take a tour. See what caring looks like first hand.

  • Brian Lowry
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My 89 year old father was sent to Heritage last week because he's been in the hospital and needed help gaining his strength so he can walk again. Unfortunately he didn't have a good experience at Heritage. He told the nurse that he had been constipated for 8 days ever since he left the hospital and she ignored this important fact and didn't do anything. Because he was so constipated he had to be admitted back to the hospital. He said he didn't want to go back to Heritage because he was not well taken care of, the food was bad and the bed was incredibly uncomfortable.

  • Joseph Samra
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    Mom. Already in .about 3 month now. Very good treatment. Nurses.very effective. They always answer your demand. Tried many other rehab in Bradenton. And was very disappointed with them. I do thank them for all what they are doing for the last moment of Moms life.

  • Robert rohr
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I can only echo the comments of the previous negative posters. My Mother in Law was transferred there from Blake Hospital. They were nasty and told a Woman that could not move her arms to "feed" herself". If she soiled herself because too much medication was given, she was screamed at. She stopped eating and drinking and was in terrible pain. She was taken to Blake Hospital again. An ultrasound showed he bladder was amazingly distended. Blake drained a quart or more urine from her. Checking urine output is basic care. Stay away from this place if a family member is at all important to you.

  • Kim Becker
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    I have been to several Rehabilitation Centers over the past 10 years between Bradenton and Sarasota and I can honestly say that Heritage Park is by far the best. After my recent knee replacement surgery, I could barely walk and I knew that I needed more help. The Nursing staff was very attentive, patient and caring. The Therapists were very considerate of me and my situation. They continuously added new exercises to my program to keep me interested and progressing. During Therapy, they stretched my limitations to improve me until I was fully functional again. I had a seamless transition from the hospital, to Heritage Park and then back home. My overall experience from the Aides to the Nurses and Therapists was excellent! I would highly recommend Heritage Park to anybody needing Rehabilitation.

About Heritage Park Care And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameLp Bradenton LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 23, 1986 (32 years)
Capacity120
Residents94
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Heritage Park Care And Rehabilitation Center

Heritage Park Care And Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 17, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

July 26, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program for mentally-ill and mentally-retarded patients.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

June 28, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.

November 24, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Heritage Park Care And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
95.6%
95.6%
95.6%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.5%
91.8%
91.7%
94.9%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.1%
87.2%
84.8%
91.7%
52.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.0%
15.7%
14.0%
14.6%
27.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.1%
19.4%
10.5%
16.1%
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.1%
8.3%
6.8%
5.2%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.5%
9.8%
16.3%
16.7%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.1%
9.3%
4.9%
1.7%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.2%
8.3%
3.4%
1.8%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2%
4.2%
1.3%
1.4%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.8%
94.6%
96.9%
97.5%
88.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.4%
95.6%
95.6%
95.6%
85.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.1%
61.7%
60.5%
59.2%
64.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.8%
12.2%
13.3%
11.1%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.2%
0.3%
0.3%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places