Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Bear Creek Nursing Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Hudson Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Amy Henderson
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    We visit residents regularly now we don't know anyone personally but we have formed relationships with residents and they are treated so kindly and they have lots of fun there. We have been there many times of the day dinner always looks pretty good and they can have visitors anytime and from what we seen residents are pretty much always happy

  • Georjean Labuzzetta
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My friend was admitted to this facility for rehab, upon discharge from Bayonet Point Hospital. She had bugs in her room. Also, while the nursing assistant was very kind to her, the charge nurse wasn't. My friend is a retired nurse, who was very skilled. She suffered from a massive stroke 4 years ago, and has aphasia. Nurses are supposed to be kind and caring. Those few who are not, need to find another line of work.

  • Marie Ree
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    The nursing staff is horrible, they make you pay SO much up front and then when you don't use it all, I'm STILL waiting for a refund almost 2 months ago!!!! It smells terrible, the facility itself is rundown and dirty. DO NOT TAKE ANYONE YOU CARE ABOUT HERE!!!!!!

  • Peggy Thurston
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    When my 93 year old grandmother who had mild dementia had a TIA, she was sent from the hospital to a rehab. My brother and I went through checking various rehabs with life time residents. , because she had dementia, our main concern was how she would be treated by the staff. In our research, we paid more attention to how the residents acted, happy, sad , upset, and listened to the staff speaking with them , and how they were treated, in the whole facility. I can tell you, that we were SO impressed. After speaking with the full time residents, and listening to the staff treat them all as family, we knew that this was the place for her. and she was loved. I would come in all various times night or day, and see staff talking to her while she laid in her bed, unable to sleep. She ALWAYS had a huge smile when any of them walked in the room. She stayed almost a year, and actually died there as she was talking to ladies waiting to go in and see a show. My mother was also here 2 times for rehab. You may find nicer looking facilities, and the staff may not appear as professional as you had in mind, but I ASSURE you , it's the very best place to be. I would never take a family member any where else.

  • robert lambert
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    I was there for 4 week and was very happy the workers were very nice could not ask for more

About Bear Creek Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameBear Creek Nursing Center LLC
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Other
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 15, 1981 (38 years)
Capacity120
Residents105
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Bear Creek Nursing Center

Bear Creek Nursing Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 27, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

June 17, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$3,023 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Bear Creek Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 50min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.9%
86.7%
82.1%
70.0%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.7%
24.7%
23.8%
24.3%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.7%
17.5%
24.8%
16.5%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.1%
6.4%
6.2%
4.0%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.9%
12.0%
11.7%
14.1%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.4%
5.3%
4.7%
5.4%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3%
7.4%
1.8%
7.6%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.6%
2.1%
4.0%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4%
2.9%
0.0%
1.4%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.1%
10.7%
6.2%
1.4%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5%
1.3%
1.6%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
3.4%
0.0%
0.9%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.5%
98.6%
98.2%
98.4%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.5%
98.6%
98.6%
98.6%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.0%
79.0%
81.3%
81.4%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.8%
8.0%
8.8%
12.3%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.6%
1.2%
0.7%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places