Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Park Ridge Nursing Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Jacksonville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology.

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kwen Oya
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Jeff Tomack the Guy in charge acts as if he needs to be checked into the facility! He walks around scratching his head like he has no idea what to do.... I just walked out on my shift today because my heart just couldn't take it anymore the way those people are treated in that place. It's very sad! The energy there in that place is completely EVIL! If your parents are there I would get them OUT quick and fast!!! This whole place of business needs to be shut down!!!!! Nothing but a bunch of Crooks, Coke Heads, and Coons....

  • Heather Miller
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Complete incompetence and negligence. My father would still be alive today if not for the negligent doctors on staff here. He died of hunger and thirst when they knew damn well he had such dementia that he could not care for himself! The nurse in charge of his care the night he nearly died refused to allow him to be weighed, in a vain attempt to hide his emaciation. I hope many souls haunt this staff and property until things change. You should all be ashamed!!

  • Fully Conscious
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Terrible place to work for and to bring your loved ones. Awful communication between management and staff. Cheap supplies to provide physical care to residents. Desperately needs new friendly management team with better organization.

  • Latesha Williams
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    This place i wouldnt recommend to no one as a place to work for and as a place to bring your loved ones. There is a huge lack of communication in some departments the staff is so occupied the residents wait sometimes between 30 minutes to an hour for care. The cnas are over whelmed with the residents having to attented to several issues at one moment. Ive over heard several complaints from the family member concerning unacceptable conditions of the residents and have seen nurses rushing to get residents up simply cause there visitors/family has come to see them and they dont want them to complain. Poorly organized and ran facilty and housekeeping is greatly over looked as well as dietary.

  • King Corvus
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

About Park Ridge Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameFive Points Healthcare Ltd
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1993 (25 years)
Capacity104
Residents86
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Park Ridge Nursing Center

Park Ridge Nursing Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 22, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

October 22, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$8,190 fine
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's room or bathroom and bathing area.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Park Ridge Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 55min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
44.4%
32.4%
37.5%
37.8%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
43.7%
50.7%
49.4%
42.0%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
32.9%
32.6%
19.1%
22.0%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
27.0%
24.1%
20.6%
24.2%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.4%
10.1%
10.7%
19.7%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.1%
3.9%
4.9%
3.6%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.8%
3.8%
3.4%
4.9%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.9%
7.9%
4.1%
1.9%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.6%
1.4%
5.3%
1.3%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.5%
3.9%
7.3%
4.8%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
2.8%
1.9%
1.9%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.0%
66.7%
66.7%
66.7%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.9%
79.4%
76.8%
57.5%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.5%
12.2%
8.7%
10.3%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
4.3%
2.4%
2.8%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
0.8%
0.8%
0.9%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places