Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

South Campus Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Florida (FL)
  4. Leesburg
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Christy Tenny
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My mother was at South Campus for 14 months. My personal experience was all good. There was times mom needed tending to but all I had to do is tell someone. They treated mom with dignity and respect. The staff all loved mother. My average was 6 days a week visiting mom. I have nothing but respect for South Campus staff. Gayle Tennyson...thank you all.

  • Jonathan Tunstall
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    In my understanding you need to be over a certain age to be accepted to this place. This completely blows my mind,what does age matter? You accept the insurance but not their age? Shame,shame,shame on you......

  • Kitty Yost
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My mother was there for over a year, the staff, nurses,cnas dietician all cared for mom. Very caring facility. Thank you

  • anita arnold
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My experience as an employee there has " NOT " been a good one at all l have worked there for 3 months and upon my hiring the ADON told me what l would be making per hour and when l received My check it was way totally different than what l was told and to top it off it was almost 30 days before l received my first check l was apalledvat what l would be making and how long it took me to get paid.. They don't do rounding when you report to work and so you walk into a mess every time, the rooms are always dirty, cramped and odorous, you can never find supplies when you need them and on the weekend you can forget it, l find residents with 2 briefs on, which l never could understand why. Garbage sometimes running over, l have found briefs in the sink, there are barely any snacks for residents, call lights going off and a nurse could be right there and will not answer the light, their new wage scale is not what it should be, l haven't seen wages to be so low for all the work you have to do, and they use staffing agencies to staff the facility more than they have their own... I felt so out of place there because lam not use to those types of conditions to what l have experienced, there are a couple of nice workers there and that's about it, when its time to go home, l have seen staff come in and punch the time clock and turn around a go have a cigarette or two, then report to the floor to go to work and we endbup leaving work late because they are out smoking ll have seen it.l would not recommend coming here until they fix up the place, fix up staffing, fix up the wages, stop using staff agencies.... INVEST IN YOUR STAFF THAT YOU HAVE!.

  • Janet Seat
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    A one is too good for this place. Rooms are small and cramped. The wait for assistance is a half hour at least. Usually longer. They took my Mom to Doctor appointment on a 45 degree day with no jacket. The attendant had a coat on when he walked her over to the appointment. I regret letting her go here. The hour drive to the other facility with a bed available would have been worth it. Won't make that mistake again.

About South Campus Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameSouth Campus Facility Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 28, 1980 (37 years)
Capacity120
Residents93
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for South Campus Care Center

South Campus Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 1, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

December 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

September 2, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

January 26, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive the right treatment and services to residents who display physical or psychosocial problems adapting to changes in circumstances.

January 21, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of South Campus Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.3%
93.4%
93.4%
93.4%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.5%
84.8%
84.0%
88.4%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
31.6%
48.4%
45.7%
40.6%
52.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.1%
14.1%
18.8%
20.5%
27.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
38.0%
26.4%
30.8%
31.3%
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.4%
7.6%
8.8%
16.3%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.4%
7.4%
12.2%
12.3%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
25.1%
28.8%
27.6%
22.5%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.9%
16.9%
6.5%
9.3%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.5%
6.7%
3.6%
7.8%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
21.1%
32.4%
7.8%
7.4%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
3.9%
5.2%
4.7%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9%
5.1%
2.5%
7.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
1.8%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2%
1.3%
1.2%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.1%
96.6%
92.4%
89.5%
88.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.5%
92.2%
92.2%
92.2%
85.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.0%
77.6%
78.2%
83.7%
64.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.0%
25.0%
27.0%
26.0%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3%
4.7%
3.2%
3.6%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
4.6%
4.3%
5.1%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places