Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Avante At Melbourne Inc

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Melbourne Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Noel McPherson
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I'm giving it one star because my mother feels comfortable there because my dad passed there. I am fortunate this visit my mother can get up and go to the bathroom on her own. If your love one can't don't bring them here. Especially if you can't visit them daily. When I visit my mom she likes to sit outside and many do, it nice. There have been a few times that I went 2 and 3 o'clock, it's horrible that some of the folks had to wait that long for a nurse to get them up for the day. These are great people their disable and need help. I wish the CNAs had to sit in a wet diaper til 2 in the afternoon for someone to come and help them up and start the day. Let them brush there hair and teeth. The first night my mother stayed there she told them she could get up and they insisted that she wear a diaper because they don't know her and it's her 1st night and that they do that to everyone. It's horrible.

  • Gayla Hayes
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Very pleased with the care my father received at this facility. We were on vacation when he got sick and had to be in ICU. He need rehab before we could go home. Difficult situation made better knowing he was receiving good care. Staff we encountered, for the most part, were very caring and considerate of our situation. We would recommend Avante of Melbourne to anyone needing care.

  • Joyce Terry
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My father was admitted here after a hip surgery. In less than 48 hours, his blood sugar levels sky rocketed because they refused to give him the proper dosage. I had to call 911 because they failed to administer the proper medication. One aide cursed at me for calling 911 and the others just stood by saying nothing. The EMT informed me that they frequent this facility often due to neglect. Upon getting him to the hospital, the doctors informed me that he could have gone into shock or diabetic coma. Do not put your loved one in this facility. There's a reason one of the photos on this site has an ambulance pictured in it. Research other rehab facilities in the area and learn from our mistake. Thankfully, my father received lifesaving treatments, but if I had waited any longer, we would have been planning his funeral.

  • Chris Boroff
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I love this place ppl are happy and the staff is the best

  • Patricia Massaro
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    The "care" there is horrendous!!! My father is disgusted with the way they treat him and their practices. They are always on the phone, they will put the guy in the room on the pot right in from of my dad while he's eating, they forget to cap the IV, and so on, and so on. TERRIBLE! With that said, the physical therapy group is outstanding. They have managed to get him mobile again better than before.

About Avante At Melbourne Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameAvante At Melbourne, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1989 (30 years)
Capacity110
Residents91
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Avante At Melbourne Inc

Avante At Melbourne Inc was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 8, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

February 13, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$4,648 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Avante At Melbourne Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
50min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.1%
97.7%
97.7%
97.7%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.7%
96.1%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
56.0%
45.8%
44.0%
43.5%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
32.8%
27.6%
20.8%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.2%
24.8%
6.1%
12.0%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.7%
10.7%
9.9%
9.2%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.4%
10.0%
16.7%
10.6%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
1.3%
2.8%
7.6%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.9%
10.0%
8.8%
0.0%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
5.2%
1.2%
1.4%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
1.3%
1.4%
0.0%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
3.9%
2.8%
3.0%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
0.8%
1.0%
1.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

87.9%
91.1%
89.2%
94.1%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.0%
89.3%
89.3%
89.3%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.3%
86.5%
85.1%
84.2%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
4.2%
9.7%
20.0%
25.0%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.6%
1.3%
2.1%
3.4%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places