Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Orchard Ridge

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Florida (FL)
  4. New Port Richey
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kitty Rodriguez
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    For an Nursing & Assisted living and rehab facility it smells very nice. That is the one major thing I judge by is if they can keep their patients dry...if you know what I mean. The staff is also very friendly, knowledgeable, and willing to help any way they can. My mom is treated with respect and with dignity. You just can't ask for more then that. Hats off to Tatianna (one of mom's assistant) and Kurt (one of her nurses) who would go well out of their way to help and to make me feel comfortable and at ease in the mists of a very stressful situation. Thank you, Orchid Ridge, for caring.

  • Amy Kessler
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Family member was sent there with a trach with the understanding and assurance the staff were competent and qualified to properly care for her needs. Our family member ended up being rushed to the hospital due to pneumonia and secondary infections of the trach due to poor care / lack of knowledge of what they supposedly knew how to maintain. Never received her scheduled breathing treatments and the machine was still in the room in its packaging from the day of admission until the day she was rushed out via EMS (2 weeks later). Staff was friendly... Just not knowledgeable about patients that need skilled nursing...

  • Maria Perez
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Thank you Kary ,Carmen,David,Katy,Bridge,Alex and all other Nurse that I can't remember their names ,thank to all staff that take care my husban and special thank's to Amparo ,to have specil care for her people . Thank againg for all of you you are very special for me . My husban have two year there and s I very happy with tere Nurse and staff.?????

  • Amparo Lago
    ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    Our love one was taken out of this facility in a septic shock stage due to the negligence of the nursing staff and the HC Director Dr. Usha Agarwal. A UTI was diagnosed and not treated for 5 days. She was in ICU for 13 days. Shame on the State of Florida for issuing a 5 star rating at the time.

  • A Google User
    ★★★★★ 6 years ago

    This place is the worst place to leave a family member !

About Orchard Ridge

General Information

Legal Business Name4927 Voorhees Road LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 23, 1983 (34 years)
Capacity120
Residents119
Percent Occupied99%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Orchard Ridge

Orchard Ridge
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 23, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintKeep all essential equipment working safely.

January 26, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

September 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Orchard Ridge require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
94.6%
94.6%
94.6%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.5%
84.1%
95.0%
78.8%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
36.0%
48.3%
41.4%
41.7%
52.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.4%
18.5%
14.9%
21.1%
27.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
33.0%
30.8%
28.0%
31.9%
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.9%
14.6%
12.5%
8.2%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.4%
19.7%
19.4%
30.9%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.9%
10.1%
7.0%
5.8%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.9%
10.0%
12.0%
3.8%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7%
1.4%
3.0%
4.5%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
11.8%
10.5%
10.4%
7.5%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.6%
3.7%
7.9%
7.3%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
0.0%
1.2%
3.5%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.5%
4.9%
6.4%
5.0%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

66.4%
69.2%
69.0%
61.1%
88.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.0%
71.6%
71.6%
71.6%
85.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
29.4%
38.3%
51.3%
53.1%
64.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.1%
18.7%
12.1%
15.7%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
1.9%
1.5%
1.6%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.0%
0.3%
0.3%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places