Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Hampton Court Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Florida (FL)
  4. North Miami Beach
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Hampton Court is the very best skilled nursing facility that I have ever worked in. The building is pristine and odor-free. They have the absolute best wound care team, Rehab dept that will ensure that patients get back to their 100% by the discharge date. The nursing department is excellent meaning top notch! The staff is truly united like a family. This translates into excellent care delivery; from the great food in the dietary whether regular or Kosher to a welcoming staff with lots of smiles. The facility gets very busy so we work together to make sure that all resident's needs are met in a timely fashion; The management team is extremely supportive to both staff and patients. Overall, this is indeed a 5 stars facility without a doubt because I am able to compare Hampton Court to other facilities where I have worked. (Also- I was not paid to provide this review- I am just an employee who would like to provide a voice because I work there and experience the clean and zen-like atmosphere working full time) Why did I provide this review: This is to assist future customers in their decision making. Do not let one person who had a negative experience discourage you. If you have any issues during your stay, have the staff page the supervisor immediately and the issue will be rectified if at all possible. We appreciate feedback & I wish that everyone who did not experiencing a 5 star stay needed to involved the management team. Thank you.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I usually do not like to make recommendations but I will make an exception for a facility that well deserves the 5 stars. My mother has been a resident at Hampton Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center since February this year. She has received outstanding services since the moment she was admitted. The nursing staff has been nothing but excellent in providing her with quality care, they are very timely in responding to all her needs. The rehab team got her up and walking, something we thought she would never be able to do again. The food always looks and smells very appealing. My family and I are forever grateful to the care this facility that I highly recommend provides.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    One Week after arriving here. Mom was not walking at all for almost 8 months . The staff is great. Very honest, loving and clean center.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Family run establishment providing highly professional care. One of the few facilities that maintains a 5-star status with the State. Clean, professional and devoted to excellence.

  • ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    The nursing staff is way to busy! I observed the nurses working hard but the place is short staffed and have too many clients in the facility. The PT/OT staff were very good. Speech therapy needs improvement.

About Hampton Court Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameHampton Court Nursing Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 3, 1991 (27 years)
Capacity120
Residents111
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Hampton Court Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Hampton Court Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 5, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Hampton Court Nursing And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 15min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 5min
4hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.9%
98.9%
98.9%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
52.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.6%
26.7%
29.4%
26.9%
27.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.2%
8.6%
41.4%
-
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.8%
12.3%
14.1%
10.8%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.3%
0.0%
34.3%
14.8%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7%
3.7%
8.8%
10.8%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7%
5.3%
5.5%
9.2%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.9%
6.0%
8.8%
7.2%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8%
2.6%
0.8%
2.1%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3%
2.4%
2.5%
1.2%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.8%
99.4%
100.0%
100.0%
88.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.1%
95.8%
95.8%
95.8%
85.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
34.1%
13.1%
12.2%
25.4%
64.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.1%
18.6%
22.3%
24.6%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.2%
0.5%
0.0%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.6%
0.9%
0.7%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places