Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Quality Health Of North Port

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. North Port Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Stephanie Redoutey
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I worked with the Director of social services and she was horrible. She treated me so bad I ended up quitting. I could not take her abuse anymore. I had severe anxiety every time I knew I had to go into that place and see her. I was always thinking what is she going to say I did wrong that she taught me to do. She would tell me a way to do something then tell me it was wrong right after she told me to do it that way. Then write me up for what she showed me how to do. It seemed she was jealous of me for so reason so she wanted to make my life hell and make me feel incompetent about myself and second guess everything I did. Also the way she talks about residents families and residents behind their backs horrified me. You don't do that if you are a true social worker. She should not be the director there or anywhere. She does not know how to do that job and she definitely is not a true social worker. If she was she would know the code of ethics and follow them. I am so much happier I am away from that woman.

  • Marie DeCoste
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    I cant believe a nursing home wont treat their patients for UTI'S unless they have a temp! This place treated my grandfather poorly. I have been a CNA for 15yrs and i treat all my residents as if they were family and to hear how my grandpa was treated brought tears to my eyes. Please do your research when you are placing your loved ones in someone elses care. This is not the place to bring your family! Anyone who gave this place a 5 star probably works there because my boss tries to make us do the same thing at my job to make sure the ratings are high.

  • Big Douglas
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Whenever I get a package of plain M&Ms, I make it my duty to continue the strength and robustness of the candy as a species. To this end, I hold M&M duels. Taking two candies between my thumb and forefinger, I apply pressure, squeezing them together until one of them cracks and splinters. That is the "loser," and I eat the inferior one immediately. The winner gets to go another round. I have found that, in general, the brown and red M&Ms are tougher, and the newer blue ones are genetically inferior. I have hypothesized that the blue M&Ms as a race cannot survive long in the intense theater of competition that is the modern candy and snack-food world. Occasionally I will get a mutation, a candy that is misshapen, or pointier, or flatter than the rest. Almost invariably this proves to be a weakness, but on very rare occasions it gives the candy extra strength. In this way, the species continues to adapt to its environment. When I reach the end of the pack, I am left with one M&M, the strongest of the herd. Since it would make no sense to eat this one as well, I pack it neatly in an envelope and send it to M&M Mars, A Division of Mars, Inc., Hackettstown, NJ 17840-1503 U.S.A., along with a 3x5 card reading, "Please use this M&M for breeding purposes." This week they wrote back to thank me, and sent me a coupon for a free 1/2 pound bag of plain M&Ms. I consider this "grant money." I have set aside the weekend for a grand tournament. From a field of hundreds, we will discover the True Champion. There can be only one.

  • Stephen Jordan
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I have visited this facility several times for work related reasons and have always found the staff to be professional and courteous. The communication seems top notch and everyone from the administrator to the front line staff are friendly.

  • Erin McDonald
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I just visited a friend at this location and all I can say is I have NEVER IN MY LIFE been to a place that cares so little for their patients! I can not believe the way they treat people. NEVER use this place it I could give it a negative star I would and if I could I would say this place should be shut down. They had one staff member that actually cared named William and he was great but every other staff member I saw or interacted with was horrible.

About Quality Health Of North Port

General Information

Legal Business NameM-K Of North Port L L C
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1986 (34 years)
Capacity120
Residents101
Percent Occupied84%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Quality Health Of North Port

Quality Health Of North Port was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 8, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

February 2, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

November 3, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTell the resident or the residents representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the residents bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Quality Health Of North Port require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.8%
98.9%
98.9%
98.9%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
100.0%
100.0%
98.9%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
45.8%
38.1%
37.5%
40.7%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.0%
15.3%
15.3%
16.7%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
9.3%
11.3%
10.6%
18.6%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.5%
9.1%
12.8%
13.6%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.4%
6.0%
8.5%
13.2%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.0%
4.2%
1.4%
2.4%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8%
7.0%
10.6%
9.2%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.5%
6.5%
10.6%
4.4%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
6.4%
8.9%
3.4%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7%
3.8%
2.5%
3.4%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

86.8%
88.6%
88.2%
90.8%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.8%
90.5%
90.5%
90.5%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.0%
73.4%
79.1%
84.0%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
26.2%
32.6%
26.0%
14.8%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
0.0%
1.1%
1.4%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.7%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places