Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Solaris Healthcare Windermere

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Florida (FL)
  4. Orlando
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Lisa Rivera
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My mother stayed there last year. She had an awful experience. Too many bad things to list.

  • Ali Shoeibi
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    The nurses do not answer call light at all!!! It is like they do not even care about the residents. The CNA's are the only ones who actually care and answer call lights. The directors assistant Kris walks past call lights and doesn't answer them either.

  • Nesha Zeigler
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Loved this facility for my mom. The staff is very friendly and take such great care of their residents.

  • Marla Stevenson
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Outstanding. Friendly and helpful staff. Exceptional activities offered. Happy residents.

  • Loree Linde
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    They gave excellent care to my husband during his stay"

About Solaris Healthcare Windermere

General Information

Legal Business NameSolaris Healthcare Windermere LLC
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Other
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 18, 1997 (20 years)
Capacity120
Residents106
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Solaris Healthcare Windermere

Solaris Healthcare Windermere
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 1, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

January 14, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Solaris Healthcare Windermere require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

88.9%
88.3%
88.3%
88.3%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2%
95.9%
98.6%
94.3%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.0%
45.9%
43.8%
34.8%
52.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.6%
28.0%
30.4%
26.2%
27.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
22.3%
22.4%
15.1%
13.6%
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.9%
12.7%
11.9%
15.2%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.8%
11.8%
11.5%
3.4%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7%
16.4%
17.4%
14.7%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
3.1%
6.6%
3.4%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
9.1%
3.1%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
5.5%
13.0%
8.7%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
1.4%
1.4%
2.9%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
4.5%
4.9%
3.1%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

88.0%
87.9%
88.5%
86.2%
88.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.4%
85.0%
85.0%
85.0%
85.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.9%
75.3%
84.1%
88.0%
64.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
1.6%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6%
2.8%
4.4%
3.2%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places