Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Mark Village

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Palm Harbor Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Karla Lindeen
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My Mother was a patient in the Betty Fresh Rehab and Spa at St. Mark Village, after a hospitalization. She received wonderful care during her stay. The Therapy Department was both patient and effective at the same time. My Mom was able to improve her overall physical status while there even though she had a lengthy hospital stay prior to being at St. Mark Village. It gave me peace of mind to know that she was staying at such a safe and caring facility. She enjoyed not only the Therapy staff but also the Nursing staff and still tries to keep in touch with them. I highly recommend St. Mark Village.

  • Leonard H
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I have been a patient in the Rehab unit 3 times in the last year. Its not great to not be able to go to home after a hospital stay, BUT they make you feel at home with the great food and good clean accommodations. The nursing staff was very attentive to my needs and always very pleasant to me. All the other patients that I talked to (in the unit) were also were very happy with them. The therapists are also top notch- specially Julie- very caring about what she does- very patient and sweet to me.

  • Stephen H. Watkins
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Incredible support and living environment for Parents. My parents moved in about seven years ago.... and have loved it. My father passed recently and I must say the pouring out of help and support for both mother and family have been beyond belief. I can not say enough about medical, facility and the people that made and make St Mark Village such a loving community. If interested in a solution for this era in life.... this is the place to live. Give management a call and check it out for you or your loved ones. (not a paid ad!)

  • Christian C
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Wonderful facility!! Such caring staff. The food is great!! Nice and clean, I would recommend this facility to everyone. Blessings

  • Healthcare Practitioners
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Tough go getting answers from nursing in the ALF including management. Cute, I get a response about a half an hour ago to call 2100 and this is HR and they have no idea with whom I am supposed to be speaking with. So I said to connect me to the Administrator and she isn't in her office as was hours ago. No response from the email to her either...this is not time sensitive but yesterday was to schedule Home Health. Shall I publish all the items of my concern, at least someone (unknown) got back to me publically even if no one knows who when I return the call request. Well run, don't you think. Dismayed.

About St Mark Village

General Information

Legal Business NameSt Mark Village Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 24, 1980 (39 years)
Capacity80
Residents62
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Mark Village

St Mark Village was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 16, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Mark Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 5min
2hr 50min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 45min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 55min
4hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.7%
33.3%
44.0%
31.8%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.6%
13.6%
18.6%
8.7%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.3%
9.6%
8.9%
3.8%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.7%
8.1%
11.1%
9.5%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.0%
15.7%
7.1%
6.1%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.8%
3.9%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
0.0%
1.8%
1.9%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.6%
6.6%
5.6%
3.9%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.8%
99.1%
99.0%
98.1%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.0%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.0%
71.8%
79.1%
71.9%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
2.6%
3.3%
3.5%
1.1%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places