Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Palm Garden Of Port Saint Lucie

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Port St Lucie Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • J Ely
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My husband was very ill and came to you in a weakened condition. His care and concern was very touching; Your staff is very caring. Keith was a wonderful physical therapist, having given Graham strength and confidence. He is definitely an asset to you. Well done Keith! My ignorance regarding medical insurance was appeased by Jeff. Bless him for all of the help and getting us on the right road to health insurance. The entire staff is friendly and helpful. I pray that Graham need not return to a rehab but you would be the only one that we would consider. Thank you. God bless!

  • Laura Weathers
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    My mother is here..the place is clean and does not smell as many nursing homes do. The food and dinning is pretty decent. The therapists are exceptional.. as for the nursing staff..it depends on the individual. Some are very professional and caring but others are more lethargic and apathetic than some of the patients.. but overall..pretty good.

  • James Evans
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    I am not sure why people are rating this nursing home with low stars. This place is the best nursing/rehab home I have been or ever visited. The place is super clean, the clinical team is very professional and the overall staff is caring and truly devote to the patients. I would always leave her with a sense of peace that she was in great hands and definitely she was. My mom went in for rehab and transitioned to the residential until she passed away. Palm Garden was a family to my family and I can't be more grateful. They really did an exemplar job and the facility is excellent. I highly recommend it to everyone.

  • ska one
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    This place is horrible!... Just got a call from my grandmother... They ignore her when she needs to use the bathroom (she cant go by her self) then she ends up going to the bathroom in the bed... When i called the 1st floor supervisor said they are busy and will get to hee after they are finished serving dinner! Its happened 2 times in tbe last week! This place should be shut down!... Horrible employees walk around miserable act like they dont want to be there and management seems nonexistent!... Find a better place for your loved ones!...

  • Naomi Green
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    The facility is nice but the staff is very slow and lazy. They aren't constantly checking their patients like they should. My dad asked a nurse for something and got it 30 minutes later smh

About Palm Garden Of Port Saint Lucie

General Information

Legal Business NamePalm Garden Of Port St Lucie LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 25, 1988 (32 years)
Capacity120
Residents104
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Palm Garden Of Port Saint Lucie

Palm Garden Of Port Saint Lucie was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 13, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

April 14, 2015 - 5 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$4,030 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Palm Garden Of Port Saint Lucie require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

85.3%
90.9%
90.9%
90.9%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.4%
98.8%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
35.9%
33.3%
52.6%
59.1%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.8%
26.6%
24.7%
23.0%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
20.5%
34.0%
38.0%
20.0%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.1%
9.5%
10.0%
10.0%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.7%
12.7%
35.2%
21.1%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2%
2.4%
5.1%
8.8%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
3.1%
1.0%
2.7%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9%
3.8%
7.7%
7.3%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.7%
2.4%
0.0%
1.2%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3%
1.2%
2.5%
1.2%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
1.1%
0.9%
0.9%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.6%
96.7%
100.0%
100.0%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.8%
90.6%
90.6%
90.6%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.6%
75.6%
71.0%
75.5%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.0%
6.8%
8.4%
9.2%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.6%
4.4%
5.9%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
0.5%
0.4%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places