Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Florida (FL)
  4. Sarasota
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:
  • Photos are copyrighted by their owners

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I love working for Heartland of Sarasota! Before I became employed and I was taking clinicals, I knew I would be happy there because I loved the way I saw the nurse aids and nurses treat the residents/patients. They always treat them with patience and kindness! Not only that but my bosses are AMAZING! I've never worked for a place that made me feel appreciated until I became a CNA for Heartland!

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Out standing care from all staff. Fast response to room call bell every time. All staff personable and caring. I really can't say enough good things about this place. I had a double knee replacement and I believe their positive attitude and attention to all of my concerns made for a fast recovery.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I miss working for Heartland especially for Ms. Karen Schaupeter that lady right there is FREAKING AWESOME!!! I miss her... Staff was awesome it was the Administration that sucked!.. Overall Great Team!!!.. I miss you guys..?

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My mom spent 18 days at Heartland. She came in with a severe case of pneumonia and had lost 20 lbs. Heartland got her back on her feet, always had wonderful words of encouragement, and treated her like family. It's so sad that only the disgruntled tend to leave comments. Heartland is a fabulous place and I would highly recommend it to anyone needing rehab and physical therapy. Thank you, Heartland . . . so happy to have my mom home again!!!

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My Dad's experience was terrible from the start all the way to the end. He was a short term rehabilitation patient with a broken hip. His stay ended with a trip back to the hospital! The PT, OT and doctor were all good but the rest of the care was unacceptable! The aides did not bathe him! They did not give him a toothbrush and personal care items for 2 days! The aides did not move him correctly from bed to wheel chair and back...they did not read PT or doctor's instructions!

About Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameHeartland Of Sarasota Fl LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 23, 1993 (24 years)
Capacity140
Residents97
Percent Occupied69%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 25, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

August 13, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

92.3%
92.3%
92.3%
92.3%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
97.2%
100.0%
97.5%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
52.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.4%
30.6%
27.3%
26.3%
27.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
4.9%
11.5%
17.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.2%
19.4%
18.2%
15.0%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.3%
6.7%
3.2%
13.9%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
0.0%
3.6%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
8.6%
3.1%
0.0%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3%
3.0%
10.3%
2.9%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.0%
2.8%
3.0%
10.3%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
2.5%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.8%
95.4%
93.2%
92.7%
88.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.5%
89.5%
89.5%
89.5%
85.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.4%
88.4%
91.4%
93.1%
64.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.9%
5.6%
8.0%
6.1%
12.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
2.9%
2.1%
1.3%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.2%
0.4%
0.0%
0.2%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places