Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Sarasota Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Katelynn Hansen
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    We had a wonderfully positive experience at Heartland with my mother's care. They were kind, attentive and professional. This is one of the quietest and calmest facilities I have experience in this area. I took my mother there because I originally took an elderly person, blind and deaf, to Heartland twice and both times he was treated with dignity and care. I also have a friend who's husband had a stroke and they were at Heartland for months, and I know personally how satisfied she was with his care and her ability to stay with him at any hour of the day or night. Highly recommended.

  • Jim Haberman
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My parents both resided full-time at Heartland's Sawyer Road facility in their final years - my mother for around four years and my father for around six months. In addition, my father previously made use of Heartland's short-term rehab services. Over that period, I visited them multiple times each week. In both cases, I found that the staff genuinely care about the residents, and are dedicated to providing compassionate care. I wholeheartedly recommend Heartland to anyone seeking such a facility for themselves or a loved one.

  • k srqFL
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My Uncle has stayed here several times and received excellent care by both the nursing and therapy departments. He was able to make a full recovery and is back to doing everything he was doing before and enjoying life! thank you!

  • Mark Sharff
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My father is 101. The building, staff and facility are all nice. But the social services staff, especially STACY, is sensational. Great follow through, caring, and smart. She is a star among stars.

  • Annie S
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    My mother fell and broke her hip and dicovered she was diabetic. She went to Heartland for rehab.the nurses were friendly for the most part, but there were a few incedents such as forgeting to give her insulin, long waiting periods ansewring her calls to the nurses station.upon leaving they didn't give here an operators manual or test solution for her blood testing device and minimal traing on how to use it. She has been brought to tears over this.i have had to download the manual and train myself on its operation. The cost of care doesn't come close to the care our family has recieved.

About Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameHeartland Of Sarasota Fl LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 23, 1993 (26 years)
Capacity140
Residents92
Percent Occupied66%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 29, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Heartland Health Care & Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 20min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

92.3%
95.1%
95.1%
95.0%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1%
97.3%
96.9%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.2%
15.2%
19.4%
25.0%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.4%
-
-
-
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.1%
13.5%
9.4%
9.4%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.5%
16.1%
16.1%
21.4%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
16.1%
9.4%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2%
0.0%
4.2%
0.0%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.6%
2.7%
3.5%
5.1%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.4%
16.7%
12.9%
3.1%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7%
8.1%
15.6%
3.1%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.2%
94.3%
95.7%
95.6%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.5%
88.9%
88.9%
88.9%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.1%
90.8%
94.5%
94.3%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.8%
9.0%
11.3%
11.9%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
1.6%
1.3%
0.7%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places