Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Plymouth Harbor Incorporated

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Sarasota Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Liz Anderson
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    My mom has a place there and it is really nice. She recovered from hip surgery in their rehab wing and had excellent treatment and said the staff did a great job. She said the food is really good in the dinning room. Magnificent views as well. They are building another tower for more availability of units.

  • Victoria Green
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    Former employee. Good benefits but poor management. I was fired from this job. But they did me dirty. Before I was hired they did not let me know that I would be working 11 hour shifts. The position said "dietary aide" but really you are a waitress/waiter.. a server. I told them I didn't have a lot of experience as a server I am better as a dietary aide, busser and/or dishwasher but they wanted to give me a shot anyways. I made them aware of the fact that I was a single mother with three kids. I fought hard to get too and from that job. I had a car but it broke down. I had to catch three busses to get there. they asked me could I work from 10:30-7pm. And I said yes. But the truth is you work from 10:30-9pm. They put you in wherever they feel like it. You never know the days you're going to have off until the schedule is posted. You only get one thirty minute break. But if you have customers you won't get a break at all. My first day I worked from 10am-1 I had a 20 minute break and from 1:20 until 8:45 pm I was on my feet. There are five different dinning rooms. I trained in the SCC for two weeks on and off switching between the MDR for two days then back to SCC then back to MDR. I told them that my schedule was too hectic and they suggest for me to train for the Atrium 7am-3:30p.m. I said that's perfect! However I only there for two days.. trained from 7-3:30, Then they threw me in the Atrium to work from 10:30-9pm. But I had NO previous training for that dining room in the evenings only the daytime and they threw me back in the MDR.. My issue was the fact that I was unable to learn my job correctly because they threw me all over the place. Also I wasn't properly trained because everyday I was trained by someone different and everybody has their own way they like to train. Some of the trainers were very mean and nasty to me. They expected me to know everything because I've been there for two months when I actually I spent way more time in the SCC than the MDR. There are people who've been there for months/years and they switched from dining room to dining room. Me I was lucky enough if I trained in the same spot for one week. Instead of training me with two tops and four tops. My first day I was training on 8 tops and my trainers were so busy they couldn't even train me correctly. My first day working in the dining room alone after training. I had a table of 9 people to serve. They knew I was new but they didn't care..I agree the MDR was too much for me, but I was led to believe I would be working in the SCC or Atrium. I was late twice and I missed one day of work because somebody robbed my bank account and I couldn't Uber. So after all is said and done, find out all the facts before you get hired because this place doesn't care about YOU they only care about MONEY.. they treated me as if the situation was all my fault and I admit I made a lot of mistakes but the management there is awful. They used me like a guinea pig. I would never suggest to work at this place. EVER! (Of course most people won't care cuz I'm black and fake pretend that racism doesn't exist, even though I dealt with racist customers.. let's continue to worship these companies that only care about money.)

  • REINA JAY AAVRI TROIANO
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The day I walked into Plymouth Harbor, I knew I was home. The ambiance and views are unsurpassed. There are a diverse group of friendly people which results in interesting conversations and experiences. I have now lived at PH, as we call it, for about a year and a half, and I can state with authority that living at Plymouth Harbor on Sarasota Bay is like living on a luxury ship that never leaves port. The food is excellent and varied. There is a million dollar theatre on site which hosts many different programs ranging from movies to musical programs, ...... Activities include fitness classes, swimming instruction, dance classes, a wood shop, art studio, inside and outside swimming pools. There is an excellent library where one can read a book, check out DVDs, browse various newspapers. Smith Care Center on campus provides excellent skilled nursing care including rides to medical specialists. I am very happy here and wish I had moved here earlier.

  • Charles Hobbins
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Friends and family are going to be bragging about how much they love this place

  • Debbie Butler
    ★★★★★ a year ago

About Plymouth Harbor Incorporated

General Information

Legal Business NamePlymouth Harbor, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 22, 1993 (25 years)
Capacity56
Residents43
Percent Occupied77%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Plymouth Harbor Incorporated

Plymouth Harbor Incorporated was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 20, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Plymouth Harbor Incorporated require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 40min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 5min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3%
97.1%
97.4%
97.3%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.8%
29.2%
31.0%
25.9%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
36.5%
-
-
15.9%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.5%
17.1%
17.9%
16.2%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.3%
8.7%
25.0%
3.8%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7%
8.6%
5.6%
11.1%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
0.0%
2.7%
2.1%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.1%
2.9%
8.3%
2.8%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
2.9%
7.7%
8.1%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.2%
8.9%
7.1%
8.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

91.1%
95.6%
92.1%
87.7%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.2%
97.1%
97.1%
97.1%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.5%
81.9%
81.2%
70.9%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
6.1%
4.9%
5.8%
9.8%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
2.4%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places