Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Palms Of Sebring, The

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Sebring Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Mad Hatter
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    My mother went here for Rehab, towards the end of her stay they wanted to keep my mother and have me sign my rights off to them, my mother wasn't that bad health wise, but after just a few days her mental status went really low, it was quite worrisome the way her mental health deteriorated so quickly, not the cleanest place in the world, could use better supervision of patients, a few early morning phone calls from mummy only to find out the nursing staff had no idea my mother was up and about trying to leave, even though I was doing all my mothers laundry they gave her someones cloths, I have no idea why. Oh',!, and finally when my mother did get discharged she got to come home with a small gift............Scabies, thanks Palms. I'll keep warning people about this, Florida is not a place you want to come if you are in the need of medical care in general, the local Hospitals are 50/50 at the best of times and the nursing homes are a bit worst then national average.

  • marilyn martin
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    A very nice place! Very nice staff!!

  • Jean rOACH
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    After visiting several different rehab centers in the area, this is the only one I would recommend. Food is so much better then hospital food. The staff has always been attentive and friendly.

  • Roy Irvine
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    The Palms of Sebring have probably the very WORST telephone system of any company I have ever needed to talk to.

  • Clay Gooch
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I have been eating at the Palms for over two years now as I have an older sister who lives there. The food has gone from pretty good consistently to just fair consistently during the time period. The service is consistently poor with a high turnover of wait staff. The portion size just keeps getting smaller and smaller. My sister pays a lot of money to live there and has had an increase in cost each year, but a decrease in service and quality and quantity of food. The menu has not changed in several years according to longtime residents. We are not happy, and maybe that is the reason for the low occupancy rate at this time.

About Palms Of Sebring, The

General Information

Legal Business NameSebring Senior Care LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity120
Residents106
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Palms Of Sebring, The

Palms Of Sebring, The was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 11, 2017 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

February 14, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

November 17, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Palms Of Sebring, The require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.6%
96.3%
96.3%
96.3%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
98.5%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
39.1%
-
54.2%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.9%
25.9%
33.3%
33.3%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.5%
19.6%
23.0%
21.8%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.6%
14.1%
19.0%
16.7%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6%
20.8%
13.6%
16.7%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.8%
18.8%
9.4%
7.7%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.0%
3.8%
3.7%
11.8%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.1%
6.9%
6.5%
7.6%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1%
2.9%
6.2%
3.1%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
4.2%
3.1%
3.0%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.1%
98.6%
98.3%
98.0%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.8%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
41.0%
35.0%
38.1%
43.6%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.0%
8.7%
10.0%
0.0%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
1.1%
1.6%
0.6%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
1.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places