Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Evergreen Woods

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Spring Hill Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Josie Betancourt
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    They have improved in the last couple of years. I do visit often and see what goes on. I have seen patients bite and kick the CNA. They try to reach each patients as fast they can, some are harder than others. Families should visit their relatives as much as possible. They still understaffed but they try. They have been responsive to any concern I had. They also allowed the long term patients to decorate their rooms and give it a personal touch. This helps them so much.

  • Ronald Weihs
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    please do not bring anyone you know to this place...my mom came out much worse after 20 days

  • Jerri McElroy
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    My husband has very recently been at EWHC and had been there over six weeks. He has PD and had been extremely ill from PD complications. The nurses, aids and all three therapies were outstanding. He would not be doing so well today if not for the care he recieved. They are very committed and caring. My personal opinion is that they are under staffed like most of the health rehabs.

  • Terrie Gulick
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Terrible place.... Don't send your loved ones here. It is the most horrible place. They do not take care of your loved ones. We had to stay with our family member all day to make sure they got what they needed. Food is awful...Very small, dingy rooms. Very under staffed, CNAs can never be found.......Their staff is deplorable.... Transferred our loved one out as soon as we could. Have made contact with AHCA over issues that we experienced....If we left them in this facility they would have died in there. Nurses would not listen to us.....I have worked in Health Care for 20 years and this place does not care about their patients. .The Dr was a joke. He never once came to see our loved one. We know because we were always there. When we transferred to another facility there was a big improvement in the quality of care. Please, don't send your loved ones here

  • Ashley Schertz
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Worst food, always cold. Hell on earth. Small rooms. Rude staff. Even my doctor complained about the poor condition. Water in the bathroom was extremely hot,no warm, very dangerous.

About Evergreen Woods

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 12, 1981 (38 years)
Capacity116
Residents116
Percent Occupied100%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Evergreen Woods

Evergreen Woods was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 13, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

July 14, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Evergreen Woods require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 20min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.9%
63.6%
54.8%
51.7%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.3%
37.1%
32.8%
35.5%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.0%
15.6%
18.0%
14.9%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.7%
14.8%
19.0%
10.2%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.5%
8.5%
8.3%
8.5%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.3%
9.6%
7.8%
8.2%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.5%
4.5%
3.7%
3.7%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.2%
3.4%
8.3%
3.4%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.8%
4.8%
1.6%
1.6%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.7%
97.9%
97.9%
99.5%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.9%
92.6%
92.6%
92.6%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.7%
84.1%
80.8%
78.3%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.2%
10.6%
12.9%
14.0%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.8%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
1.2%
0.5%
0.3%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places