Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Manorcare Health Services

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Venice Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Lisa Brennan
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Never having been in a rehab before I'd have to say this was a wonderful place! Staff was attentive - food was good but much too salty. Spoke with dietary Dept about it & they said they were going to change that. I'd def go back to MC if I had to :)

  • Stella Pettit
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    We are so grateful for the loving, attentive care our aunt received while spending her last few months at Manor Care of Venice. We were always warmly welcomed by the receptionists at the front desk, and upstairs staff went "above and beyond" in their efforts to provide the utmost in comfort and care. We will highly recommend this facility to friends and family who need long-term skilled nursing care for loved ones.

  • Mary Brownlee
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I cannot say enough about the experience my husband had at Manor Care of Venice. We just finished a 5 week stay for recovery from a hip surgery which got infected at the hospital and required both therapy and nursing care. Outstanding in both areas! Thank you!!

  • Lisa King
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Unfortunately, I have had to deal with several nursing/rehabilitation facilities over the last 10 years in the Sarasota/Manatee County area. I found Manor Care to be the best of the best. The facility was clean & updated. Staff was personable, caring & attentive. When I had a question or a "issue" it was addressed within a timely manor and handled professionally. I would strongly recommend Manor Care in Venice!

  • Gregory Waldron
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My father has been staying at ManorCare for a few weeks to recover from a surgery. Some of the staff at ManorCare are nice and effective, some less so. Communications between staff seems to be a major issue. For instance, my father is supposed to be on a specific diet, but sometimes they serve food that is not appropriate for his condition. In addition, generally speaking the food is not great: i.e. Cold eggs in the morning. What really angered me with this place was its recent handling of Hurricane Irma. Before the hurricane, we were informed that they would board up all windows to protect against flying glass - a basic precaution in Florida. They also informed us that family was welcome to come stay at the facility. As the hurricane approached, we were alarmed to see no plywood going up outside. On the day of the hurricane, no patient rooms had been covered, although plywood covered the glass of emergency exits and some of the common areas, such as the internet lounge and dining room. When the hurricane hit, we learned from my father that all patients were pushed into the corridors and made to sit in their wheel chairs for several hours - a great discomfort for old people with manifold ailments. Meanwhile, families of staff and patients arrived, some with pets. It was crowded and chaotic. They moved my Dad back into the room after several hours, but he was very upset and uncomfortable. When I called to complain about conditions at the facility on the day of the hurricane, the receptionist informed me that the director was "on a conference call with the governor" - as if this was supposed to impress me. I was told That she would call me after the hurricane, but she never did. Following the hurricane, the facility lost power. There is a generator, but it is insufficient to light the bathrooms, creating a major challenge for people in wheelchairs or using walkers. The air conditioning is also not working. This Irma incident was a one off, but it reflects dismal planning and poor execution.

About Manorcare Health Services

General Information

Legal Business NameManor Care Of Venice Fl LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 5, 1997 (21 years)
Capacity129
Residents110
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Manorcare Health Services

Manorcare Health Services was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 13, 2017 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.

March 3, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Manorcare Health Services require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.8%
98.6%
98.6%
98.6%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.6%
100.0%
100.0%
98.7%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.3%
83.9%
88.5%
85.2%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.3%
19.0%
25.4%
28.6%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.2%
11.1%
21.6%
2.3%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.3%
12.3%
14.9%
15.4%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.1%
17.9%
14.0%
17.1%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.4%
9.5%
10.6%
6.6%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
6.7%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4%
1.6%
4.5%
3.9%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
3.1%
1.5%
2.6%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.3%
99.7%
96.5%
95.5%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.8%
96.3%
96.3%
96.3%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.0%
65.2%
80.9%
93.4%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.6%
5.6%
5.2%
2.6%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
2.5%
2.5%
2.6%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
0.2%
0.2%
0.4%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places