Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regents Park Of Winter Park

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Florida
  3. Winter Park Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • James Snapp
    ★★★★★ 4 weeks ago

    Very nice facility. I am especially impressed with the Physical Therapy dept. They have a very fine staff, including Larry, Dan , Marissa and others who go out of their way to give Mom very attentive care. Caring staff in Dining Room like Sharon & Marie make sure Mom eats well. Front desk admin staff are courteous & helpful. Facility always very clean too

  • JoAnn Straub
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Hard time talking to staff. Left hand doesn't seem to know what right hand is doing. Can't get staff to return calls when you have a question.seem to have attitudes. Care is good but there are some issues. when told each patient only gets one blanket and if dirty family needs to clean. My recommendation is be involved.

  • Julie Lewis
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I have been a patient at Regents Park, Cambridge side, in January 16, 2019til February 21,2019, for a broken pelvis and tailbone. Keana was my physical therapist and Jamie was my occupational therapist. They were an outstanding team! They kept me motivated and educated me about my exercises. The more I understood why and what I was doing, I became self-motivated to follow through when I was discharged to go home. Next, I chose to come back to Regents Park, Bristol, from May 10, 2019 til May 30, 2019, after having a total shoulder replacement surgery for rehabilitation and to strengthen my legs, because I had very bad balance. My main focus was on occupational therapy to rehab my shoulder. Jamie is magnificent! She put her heart and soul into teaching me the exercises. If I had a problem in other areas of my recovery, she goes over and above helping me solve it. For instance, no one could find a suitable wheelchair for me width and height wise. so she searched high and low; and finally, she found one! Also, Daniel B. was an excellent physical therapist! He would thoroughly explain what and why I'm doing what I'm doing. Once again, when I understand the exercises and the reason behind them, I have a better probability of continuing them, when I leave the facility at home with home health outpatient services. Besides all that, Daniel B. is a jokester! He makes therapy fun! I am grateful to have chosen Regents Park for rehabilitation. I highly recommend it to anyone for rehabilitation!

  • Robin Murray
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I moved my mother in Regents about 7 years ago. It was a nice place with really good care. However, over the last couple years I have seen the facility consistently go down. Marvia is one of the few nurses that actually seem to care about her job. Most of the aides are either don't care about doing their job or just overwhelmed (maybe both). I had an ongoing issue and all they did was change the aide who was taking care of her (just moved the problem around) but it didn't matter because the same issue continued. Christine is amazing; she runs the care plan meetings and seems to care and the therapy staff all seem great. I have to say the one person I could always count on for a friendly smile and ALWAYS had the resident best interest was Shawna the activities director. I wouldn't recommend this unless you are there every single day and are willing to clean, feed and generally take care of your loved one. They need more qualified staff !!!!!

  • Brittany Vail
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I am writing this review on behalf of my father. He was recovering from a procedure and he had to stay at Regents for about a month in April. He has been in and out of different facilities in the area for a variety of health issues but this was his first time here. While I can't say his stay was without minor complaints (mostly stuff outside of his control), Regents is a great rehab facility. First, his primary reason was to GET BETTER AND RECOVER! So I have absolutely ZERO COMPLAINTS about the THERAPY STAFF (all of them!) and their mission to get patient's back home. They are friendly and seem to always drop everything and help. I can tell they work hard. Second, his nurses and CNAs - mostly Courtney/Amber/Claire/Fe and I'm sure others that I'm missing but THEY WERE ATTENTIVE. I had to remind my father - patience - he had to wait a few times with his call light but this is a big facility and his needs were always met. The cons - He didn't love the food but it's not my mom's cooking. He wishes he could pick his meals as he didn't like to go to the dining room often and since he's not good with remembering names, he suggests putting up a white board in the room with his nurse and CNAs names as they change throughout the day. Discharge process was a little clunky but it got it sorted out. While I hope he never has to go back to a rehab facility, we will chose Regents again.

About Regents Park Of Winter Park

General Information

Legal Business NameIslf-Regents Park-Winter Park
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 23, 1988 (31 years)
Capacity120
Residents105
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regents Park Of Winter Park

Regents Park Of Winter Park was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Florida Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 27, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regents Park Of Winter Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.9%
92.9%
92.9%
92.9%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.8%
96.6%
97.8%
97.8%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.6%
82.4%
83.3%
85.7%
53.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.4%
22.9%
16.7%
13.9%
26.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.0%
13.3%
17.1%
13.1%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.4%
21.4%
16.7%
13.6%
15.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.7%
15.9%
12.2%
11.5%
13.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.2%
4.5%
3.4%
3.4%
7.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.2%
1.3%
3.7%
7.3%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.0%
6.1%
4.5%
2.1%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
1.3%
1.3%
1.2%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.9%
8.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
1.1%
3.4%
3.3%
2.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.0%
94.5%
93.1%
89.6%
89.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.7%
90.9%
90.9%
90.9%
86.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.7%
81.8%
76.0%
83.5%
69.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.5%
13.3%
10.7%
12.9%
10.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
2.0%
2.0%
3.0%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.5%
0.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017FL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places