Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Chestnut Ridge Nsg & Rehab Ctr

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Georgia
  3. Cumming Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Live laugh love Yaz MEME
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    This is a great job by far if you are willing to travel. Good pay but could be better! The culture is cut throat so mind your business and do your job. A lot of cnas leave because of intimidation of overhead staff. Great administrator and HR DEPARTMENT!! Just need to clean house with the bad behaviors of the nursing staffing... overall the CNAS AND RESIDENTS ARE THE MAIN PRIORITY FACTORS!

  • leili chisolm
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    The experience we had with this facility is nothing short of a horrific nightmare. The 1 star is very generous. My dad was sent there following a stroke to receive therapy and rehabilitation. He was supposed to be in therapy 2 hours/day. Up until the day (Friday) he was transferred there, he had been awake, alert, and responsive. The room he was assigned was dirty, the linens were soiled, and there was a window ac unit that didn't fit properly, so the room was exposed to the outside elements. Then the nightmare began. Most of the techs who came in to do his pegtube feeding and administer meds through an IV didn't wearing gloves while handling medical supplies. We had to ask them to put on gloves for sanitary reason and we were told that not everyone wears them. Every time he needed medical assistance, it would take them over 2 hours to respond. The therapists would log 45-60 minute sessions and actually be there 10 minutes-max. My dad's suite mate confirmed this for several days. The doctor ordered 3 types of blood pressure lowering medications and, basically, put him in a coma. Over the course of 4-5 days, he went from having his vitals stable and him able to interact, to not waking up or being responsive. On day 6 (the last day) my mom asked the tech 6 times over the course of 3 hours to take his blood pressure because he was cold to the touch, blueish in color and his breathing was very shallow. When they finally took it, they panicked and called the doctor on call who never answered or called back. They called an ambulance and he went to the ER. His blood pressure and body temperature were so low he was barely alive. They actually had to give meds to bring his blood pressure UP. The last thing you want after a stroke is higher blood pressure. That's how low it was. He took 7 bags of fluid in the matter of only a couple of hours. He had a temperature of almost 102. His white blood cell count was through the roof. He had an ear infection, a double eye infection, was severely dehydrated, and had respiratory issues. The worst part? Sometime in the 1-2 days prior, when they had him in a medicine-overdose coma, he had had a heart attack due to the strain put on his heart from the lack of circulation. And through all that, the doctor never called back and my mom had to beg for them to take his blood pressure in the first place. Had she not been persistent and refused to leave him under those conditions, my dad would have certainly been dead before morning. I could go on about it. Believe me, there is enough horror to fill a book. Who knows how long it's been since the last health inspection. If it were to be inspected now, it would definitely be shut down. And the entire staff should be banned from working in the health care industry ever again. To take a man who was well alive and given a good prognosis, to him being on the brink of death within 6 days is terrifying. If your loved one is sent there DO NOT let them go. They'll probably leave in a body bag.

  • Stanley Elrod
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Would not recommend this place to anybody, my dad been there a week and I am not impressed with the health care or rehab at this point

  • misty jones
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Visiting my family member here was so sad; call lights are neglected, bed sheets are stained from bowels, staff does not wear gloves when addressing infections. I can go on but this place is not suitable for an animal let alone a human being

  • Marykatherine Cummings
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Terrible experience here! They cared for my mother for a couple of days before we got her out. No communication amongst the staff , never brought my mother lunch, nothing done in a reasonable time frame. Would never refer anyone to this place!

About Chestnut Ridge Nsg & Rehab Ctr

General Information

Legal Business NameChestnut Ridge Cypress LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1989 (29 years)
Capacity150
Residents122
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Chestnut Ridge Nsg & Rehab Ctr

Chestnut Ridge Nsg & Rehab Ctr was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Georgia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 22, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$18,942 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

March 3, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Chestnut Ridge Nsg & Rehab Ctr require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

86.4%
87.4%
87.4%
87.4%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.0%
75.0%
97.9%
88.8%
94.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
35.3%
41.7%
37.1%
50.0%
47.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.6%
28.7%
32.6%
25.5%
25.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
38.3%
41.1%
20.0%
37.5%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.0%
26.8%
23.6%
20.0%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.4%
23.5%
15.1%
20.4%
15.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.2%
8.0%
11.5%
9.6%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
1.7%
2.1%
1.9%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.4%
12.4%
7.7%
6.6%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.5%
8.4%
10.1%
8.7%
5.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.0%
4.0%
1.0%
0.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.9%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
1.6%
0.8%
1.5%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

58.5%
48.2%
31.3%
31.1%
81.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.5%
76.2%
76.8%
76.8%
79.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.3%
70.3%
74.0%
74.2%
65.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
26.5%
17.5%
14.6%
9.5%
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8%
2.7%
0.8%
2.5%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places