Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Joe-Anne Burgin Nursing Home

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Georgia (GA)
  4. Cuthbert
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Joe-Anne Burgin Nursing Home

General Information

Legal Business NameHospital Authority Of Randolph County
Ownership TypeGovernment - Hospital District
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 1, 1979 (38 years)
Capacity80
Residents74
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalYes
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Joe-Anne Burgin Nursing Home

Joe-Anne Burgin Nursing Home
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Georgia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 22, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide proof that residents' personal money that is deposited with the nursing home is secure.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionQuickly tell the resident's doctor the results of laboratory tests.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

March 16, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$3,900 fine

June 12, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

February 12, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$5,525 fine
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

May 14, 2014 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$13,098 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Joe-Anne Burgin Nursing Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 60min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.0%
97.1%
98.5%
100.0%
93.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.0%
43.5%
-
-
46.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.1%
10.3%
7.6%
7.5%
26.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
40.3%
35.2%
13.7%
21.6%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.5%
20.0%
15.1%
14.8%
19.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6%
28.1%
10.7%
18.9%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.4%
9.6%
5.8%
5.7%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2%
13.4%
6.2%
9.1%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.1%
7.8%
6.7%
2.0%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.2%
0.0%
1.5%
1.5%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.8%
7.5%
7.7%
15.2%
4.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
4.4%
4.5%
1.5%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.0%
1.1%
0.0%
1.1%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
-
79.2%
80.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
78.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
61.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
0.0%
1.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened