Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

High Shoals Health And Rehabilitation

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Georgia (GA)
  4. High Shoals
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My grandparents lived here for 1 month and the care they received was horrible. My grandpa did not even get 1 shower in his time living there, if they rang their button (meaning they need help) it would sometimes be over an hour until a staff member showed up to help, When going to meals they would be sitting there 45 minutes-hour before they would receive coldfood and the bathrooms were absolutely horrendous. All of those reasons would explain why they only lived there for 1 month. I warn you to not put anyone you care about in this nursing home.

About High Shoals Health And Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameOconee County Health & Rehabilitation, LLC
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 6, 1981 (37 years)
Capacity100
Residents89
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for High Shoals Health And Rehabilitation

High Shoals Health And Rehabilitation
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Georgia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 20, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of High Shoals Health And Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
51.9%
54.7%
56.1%
76.2%
93.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
42.9%
32.4%
48.4%
36.7%
46.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.1%
38.7%
40.3%
36.8%
26.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.3%
39.9%
19.6%
13.8%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.1%
15.1%
13.4%
16.9%
19.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.7%
23.6%
16.2%
20.3%
15.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.6%
5.4%
10.2%
5.5%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.4%
8.4%
6.1%
5.1%
7.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8%
3.4%
1.8%
3.6%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
10.5%
10.8%
10.4%
6.2%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.6%
4.8%
9.8%
8.6%
4.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5%
4.7%
3.7%
3.6%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

61.2%
71.1%
69.2%
75.9%
80.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.3%
79.5%
79.5%
79.5%
78.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
53.0%
66.0%
59.9%
52.0%
61.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.9%
13.2%
9.3%
17.3%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
2.0%
5.9%
3.6%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016GA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places