Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Powder Springs Transitional Care And Rehab

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Georgia
  3. Powder Springs Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kyle Rast
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    If you read/take away only this line from my review let it be this, Do not put your loved ones in the nursing facilities here and do not apply for a job here. The low pay and extremely stressful environments leads to good nurses getting burnt out and or leaving. This means residents end up neglected and more often than not, getting poor care from the burnt out, or poor quality nurses that remain. My family decided to place one of my grandparents here for a variety of reasons including the relative proximity to us and the combination of rehabilitation and nursing home as once their leg injury healed they could stay in the nursing home. The building itself is a bit dingy with the exception of the lobby. One of the good things I noticed was the facility was clean and well kept. Now for the issues. Finding personal can be a challenge. It can take 10 minuets for you to get assistance, which is terrible when someone who is wheelchair bound needs to go to the bathroom. When people are around they are far too occupied and are often dismissive. I later found out from several of the non-dismissive nurses that the RN to patient ratio is somewhere around 1:25/30. As for other technicians I do not know the ratio but as mentioned getting someone takes far too long. From what I've heard the pay for the technicians is ridiculously low. Often times you'll get paid more at target starting out. And the stressful environment causes massive burn out. All this leads to improper care for the residents. This culminates in the events that lead to my writing of this review. My grandparent ended up, without our consent on sedatives which impaired their coginitive state and made them virtually unable to eat the meals they were given after the dosage. On another occasion as I walked down a hall with 3 CNA's in front of me talking amongst themselves, an amputee in a wheel chair called out for their attention. They glanced at him and not stopping talking, walked into another room completely. I asked him if he needed anything he simply asked to be wheeled into his room. I genuinely hope they just didn't notice him but the fact they didn't stop disturbed me. Please do not send your loved ones here. There are plenty of well staffed nursing homes and rehabilitation facilities with lots of great nurses near by.

  • Shontaemaria R.
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I know someone that works here and although I don't work here, I'm upset. This person works a lot of hours. The paychecks don't add up. If a person works 292 hours at a rate of 10.50 (which is nothing to begin with), how can the paycheck come out to 1947?! With my calculations 292x10.50=3066! All of my loved ones' checks are like this. They are thieves!!!! They aren't paying these people overtime pay and someone in the payroll department needs to be put in jail. I'll make sure of it.

  • Brenda Perry
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Excellent place to stay for rehab Ginger,. J R Sherrie Meds man everyone Treated me like a queen. The best place to recuperate. Brenda Perry

  • Bacardistuff
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    In the rehab hallway, I was visiting my uncle and noticed that his roommate's TV had been removed out of the wall.. cords just hanging. To find a nurse, I was fortunate enough to have a fitbit so I wasn't wasting calories for nothing trying to find one. My uncle was to have no fluids. His table had five glasses of water and orange juice covered in saran wrap.

  • Brenda Patterson
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My Father was here for 12 days Feb 2019, Then we requested him to go back to the ER. He was dehydrated and has low kidney function. Some of the staff really cared about the care my father was given, but more than half do not seem to really care. There were times he did not have fresh water to drink. One afternoon I cane to check on him and they still had vomit in the floor with a sign that read wet.

About Powder Springs Transitional Care And Rehab

General Information

Legal Business Name3460 Powder Springs Road Associates, L.P.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 25, 1993 (26 years)
Capacity208
Residents191
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Powder Springs Transitional Care And Rehab

Powder Springs Transitional Care And Rehab was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Georgia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 22, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAllow residents to have visitors.

January 27, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

September 7, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Powder Springs Transitional Care And Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

64.9%
74.3%
74.3%
74.3%
94.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.4%
60.6%
60.0%
65.7%
94.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.1%
79.4%
76.7%
72.2%
47.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.3%
24.1%
22.4%
19.0%
25.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.5%
22.1%
6.2%
14.8%
17.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.6%
15.4%
17.3%
17.5%
18.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.5%
16.4%
15.9%
16.4%
15.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.8%
11.4%
13.1%
6.1%
7.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8%
5.9%
5.4%
8.0%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.0%
10.2%
7.0%
9.6%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6%
2.5%
3.7%
6.0%
4.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8%
1.8%
1.2%
0.6%
3.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3%
0.4%
0.4%
0.3%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

82.2%
83.6%
81.6%
81.7%
81.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
57.9%
74.3%
74.3%
74.3%
79.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.4%
74.1%
77.4%
74.6%
65.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.8%
17.8%
17.6%
17.5%
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
2.0%
1.5%
2.6%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.2%
0.2%
0.5%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017GA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places