Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Parkridge Specialty Care

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Iowa (IA)
  4. Pleasant Hill
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Lilly LossnerStonehocker
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    The residents speak so well of their staff. As a volunteer I see canad interactions between the residents and their staff, witness the respect and care, the exchanged smiles, meaningful touches and conversation. Beautiful seasonal decor inside and outside.

  • PJ Rundall
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Awesome care center. All therapists are excellent. Nurses and most CNAs are excellent. Most meals are good. Bedrooms with individual bathrooms and showers are really nice. However, beds are very hard. My son brought my 2" foam from my bed at home and it helped tremendously. Will miss the staff now that I'm back home alone.

About Parkridge Specialty Care

General Information

Legal Business NameCare Initiatives
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1997 (20 years)
Capacity90
Residents82
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Parkridge Specialty Care

Parkridge Specialty Care
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Iowa Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 4, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

July 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Provide 3 meals at regular times; 2) serve breakfast within 14 hours of dinner; and 3) offer a snack at bedtime each day.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

June 25, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.

December 23, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Parkridge Specialty Care require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.1%
50.0%
60.5%
59.1%
40.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.6%
27.9%
23.2%
20.0%
21.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
9.1%
22.2%
14.8%
22.2%
18.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.1%
16.4%
15.1%
17.1%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.1%
8.6%
7.4%
4.7%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.1%
7.5%
3.5%
5.6%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.3%
6.6%
6.6%
4.2%
6.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6%
3.2%
3.2%
1.9%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.2%
2.6%
3.9%
8.3%
5.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
2.6%
2.6%
1.4%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
4.0%
7.0%
7.5%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
85.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
80.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
75.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
30.6%
22.0%
25.7%
25.0%
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.9%
1.8%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places