Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Garden View Care Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Iowa
  3. Shenandoah Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Ashley Smith
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    This long-term care community is very warm and welcoming! Garden View has, without a doubt, the best therapy department and staff. The building is clean, the residents are happy and there are so many helpful staff. I wouldn't choose anywhere else!!!

  • Ruby Johnson
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My short stay was horrifying, they lied to the Hospital social worker about having a wound vac available immediately and left me off the wound vac on 2 separate days without cleaning out and packing my wounds. There nurse on nights didn't chart on my temp or signs of infection being back, the administrator was rude and dominating talking to me like I was a child being scolded. The director of nursing and her assistant both lied to my face. They decided after I got there that they could not transport me to Physical Therapy. The night my Temp was 101.3 The nurse in charge told the staff not to go in my room and she never checked on me either, thankfully my cousin spent the night with me and took care of me. Because I was unable to stand or walk, the CNA's and nurses would put me on the bed pan and leave me, I went in with Immaculate skin even after being in the hospital for over 2-3 wks then after 4 days I had bruising and skin break down on my bottom and the back of my thighs. I would not recommend this place to my worse enemy. They should be shut down and not allowed to care for anyone.

  • Middy Lighty
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Great rehabilitation n. Nice therapy employer's was there21days n the resident's were awesome n the activities director was6great nurses soso some other employees was ok mostly understand able loved them but cnas need to pull the cork out6of there asses rude unprofessional not inless they liked i was not one of they pet's seen patients go several days wearing same clothes even when they had closet full???? i was once a cna back when they didnt have all the technology n fancy lifts i mostly lifted my patients myself lazy cnas6

About Garden View Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NamePremier Estates 509 LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 1, 2004 (15 years)
Capacity90
Residents53
Percent Occupied59%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Garden View Care Center

Garden View Care Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Iowa Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 5, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$8,125 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

January 27, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

November 3, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

September 16, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
KSomeImmediate JeopardyComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Review the work of each nurse aide every year; and 2) give regular in-service training based upon these reviews.

August 12, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$117,743 fine
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.

December 17, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 34 days

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Data Not Available

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.7%
91.8%
91.8%
91.8%
96.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
95.7%
93.0%
88.9%
96.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
38.1%
40.7%
36.0%
38.5%
42.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.0%
31.7%
35.0%
31.7%
20.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.4%
24.8%
15.1%
9.0%
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.1%
19.0%
18.9%
18.9%
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.3%
17.1%
17.9%
12.8%
15.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.9%
19.1%
9.3%
4.4%
6.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7%
3.4%
0.0%
4.0%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
2.1%
7.3%
11.0%
6.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
6.7%
4.8%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7%
12.8%
4.7%
8.9%
4.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4%
4.3%
2.3%
2.2%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

51.3%
72.2%
63.6%
56.7%
87.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
62.9%
62.9%
62.9%
80.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
78.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.7%
14.8%
35.0%
4.8%
16.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places