Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Apex Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Idaho
  3. Boise Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Stephanie Christensen
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    I like the office staff, the people that work in the kitchen, the janitors, and the repairmen. They are very friendly and treat me well. I like the food and the people that give me the food are kind. Everyone is willing to help me. I like the activities we have to do and being able to meet the pets that come in to visit. I like the priorities of the staff; they try to get to know me and be friendly to me. This is like my temporary family and friends. They take good care of me by making sure I get to all my appointments and make me stronger. When I ask questions, they answer my questions in a way that I can understand. I would recommend this place and would come back if I needed skilled nursing care again.

  • Barbara Dini
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    The staff are always ready and willing and friendly. I get lots of smiles. I would recommend this place to family and friends. I have been in 2 other facilities and I know what they are like. I would give 5 stars but sometimes have to wait longer for my call light because staff is busy.

  • Anita Biggs
    ★★★★★ 4 weeks ago

    Apex Center has provided safety and good care for my disabled brother. He likes the staff and knows them all by name. All departments, from nursing, transport, administration to social work are always available to help solve problems and make the residents stay more manageable for the resident and the residents family. Overall, my brother's medical needs, social needs, and personal needs have been met by a team of pleasant, skilled really engaged professionals. Overall I give Genesis a rating of 5.

  • Michael Hawley
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Been here last couple weeks following a hip replacement in the hospital. I've liked my time here. Friendly and efficient staff. Good food. I feel well taken care of with no complaints. Clean facility. Quiet and relaxing place. Would recommend to others if you need to after a hospital stay.

  • Judith Kindelberger
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I live at Apex Center and have so for over 3 years. Overall, I'm happy with my stay here, while I'd prefer to live at a lower level of care or independently, I'm able to make the best of the situation and I receive good care here; I'm safe, secure, and looked after. Staff is very caring and goes out of their way to make sure my needs are met, sometimes even on their own time. Laundry could use some improvement with missing laundry and quality control. Would also like more input on brands of products available in supply.

About Apex Center

General Information

Legal Business NamePeak Medical Of Boise LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 28, 1980 (40 years)
Capacity148
Residents72
Percent Occupied49%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Apex Center

Apex Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Idaho Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 21, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$56,862 fine
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

July 17, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 16 days
---Fine$1,105 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Apex Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2%
98.1%
100.0%
98.2%
95.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
53.8%
-
53.8%
58.1%
47.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.3%
12.0%
8.2%
13.2%
19.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
44.3%
27.6%
18.8%
10.6%
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.4%
16.7%
17.0%
20.0%
17.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.3%
14.0%
20.8%
13.5%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.9%
10.0%
6.1%
6.1%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.1%
4.8%
4.7%
11.4%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
26.3%
16.6%
13.4%
13.4%
9.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
0.0%
2.0%
3.7%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.1%
93.5%
89.5%
92.7%
86.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.2%
95.3%
95.3%
95.3%
84.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.9%
61.3%
63.3%
62.9%
69.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
36.7%
33.3%
29.0%
21.4%
20.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.7%
0.6%
0.6%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places