Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Ivy Court

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Idaho
  3. Coeur D Alene Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Dyllon Bernal
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    I work here as a hospitality aid and can see that this facility is a great place to work and an even better way to build character. I hope to be here for years to come! :)

  • Patrick McNabb
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Ivy Court is a great facility! Amazing staff who really care for the residents. Great support from management team. Make it a fun place to work creating a home feeling environment

  • Natasha Belton
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    This is the worst place I have ever encountered. When my dad was sent there to try and get better so he could come home, they refused to do their job and take care of him. My dad had cancer and was dealing with pain from this. He was telling the staff he was in a lot of pain. Instead we were told he made their best nurses cry. If you can't handle people in pain, don't be a nurse. Then we found out that he kept asking them to take him to the hospital because the pain was so bad it brought him to tears. They REFUSED to even call my dad's doctor, basically letting him suffer. Once we found this out, we called my dad's doctor, who proceeded to call and chew this incompetent staff out. My dad's urine was DARK BROWN, and had blood. Their excuse was he wasn't drinking water. But they let this go on for days. Once we finally got him to the hospital it was too late and his cancer had spread too far. He was gone less then a week later. I would not even recommend this place to a dead dog and it needs to be shut down.

  • Mary Willeford
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Ivy Court is a really nice facility. Not in the way of fancy looks, but the staff and management care very much for the residences. Lets face it, getting old and having to live in a nursing home is challenging to say the least. But the folks here care. The food is good and the place is clean. My Mom enjoys Ivy Court very much. Your loved one is safe here with good care.

  • Andy Richards
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Did some of my training for cna here and I don't really want any of this to fall back on any one specific but the way some of the staff acted and treated the residents was not cool. I clearly remember one guy that was working there that from the words of his own coworkers has a somewhat serious drug problem but was being kept around cause no one wanted to rat him out or bother finding a replacement. I feel bad for some of the residents if it has not improved and really the state should come and give a real hard look at this place imo

About Ivy Court

General Information

Legal Business NameFmg Ironwood Place Idaho LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 15, 1973 (46 years)
Capacity80
Residents66
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Ivy Court

Ivy Court was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Idaho Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 24, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Ivy Court require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.4%
98.2%
98.2%
98.2%
96.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.2%
98.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
44.0%
60.0%
59.1%
75.0%
47.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.1%
7.5%
5.7%
5.6%
19.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
9.5%
14.3%
3.1%
16.3%
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.0%
8.3%
9.8%
14.3%
17.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.4%
12.8%
11.8%
5.6%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8%
2.0%
2.3%
2.3%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.3%
2.3%
7.7%
2.7%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
1.6%
2.0%
0.0%
9.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3%
3.7%
4.3%
1.3%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

83.3%
91.1%
95.0%
80.1%
86.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.2%
91.1%
91.1%
91.1%
84.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.1%
83.0%
80.4%
72.7%
69.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
3.3%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%
20.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.6%
1.1%
1.1%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places