Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Good Samaritan Society - Moscow Village

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Idaho
  3. Moscow Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Carol Johnson
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Had a car show, held on their grounds. Residents were able to come and enjoy the day. The grounds are park like. Very nice

  • kiley koski
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I was very sad on how they treat people there.

  • Annette Verschaeve
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    Bring your Google maps because this place is hard to find.

  • Chuck Crossler
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Very nice carrying people. Great care for your loved ones.

  • Joshua Weller
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This facility and it's staff took great care of my grandma. Thank You!

About Good Samaritan Society - Moscow Village

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 1, 1977 (42 years)
Capacity64
Residents48
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Good Samaritan Society - Moscow Village

Good Samaritan Society - Moscow Village was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Idaho Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 18, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

April 15, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Good Samaritan Society - Moscow Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

75.6%
61.4%
61.4%
61.4%
96.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.6%
75.0%
76.2%
74.4%
95.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
47.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.0%
13.5%
17.5%
15.0%
19.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.3%
21.0%
13.6%
25.5%
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
17.5%
11.9%
9.3%
17.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.8%
13.9%
18.4%
23.1%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.6%
5.0%
0.0%
7.0%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.4%
0.0%
8.3%
11.3%
9.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
2.6%
2.7%
0.0%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.3%
5.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

42.4%
51.8%
65.3%
70.5%
86.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
67.7%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
84.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.9%
80.2%
77.2%
-
69.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.2%
12.5%
16.1%
16.1%
20.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.7%
2.8%
2.9%
3.2%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places