Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Meadow View Nursing And Rehabilitation

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Idaho
  3. Nampa Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sarah Eshelman
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Before we came to Meadowview, my dad was in another facility before we came here. It was very difficult to move him because he had friends and I knew it was going to be a hard move for him. However, I am so thankful that we made the move. I am so so thankful that they had a bed open for my dad! It did take him a couple months to settle in, but he found new friends and new favorite peoples. It was a breath of fresh air. The staff was amazing! They were very accommodating. They did everything they could to make dad's last months as comfortable as possible for both my mom and dad. After dad's memorial, I called and asked if we could drop off all the flowers. The staff met us at the front door with hugs. The staff never came across like it was just a job to them. It was obvious to me that they care about their residents and their families. Thank you all so very much!

  • Canyin Barnes
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    The team at Meadow View Nursing and Rehab is outstanding. They truly care about their patients. The staff love to work there. Virtually no turnover and their #1 priority is patient care. I've know that team a long time and I would recommend it to anyone when trying to place their loved one. Oh and I remodel is going to be amazing. Check it out. I did. Between nursing, social services, rehab and Administration they all are making a difference in people's lives.

  • Sandra Balance
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Excellent care for our Mother! We could not have asked for better care. Staff professional, friendly and kind. Highly recommend.

  • Makaila Bingham
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I coordinate care clinically with this facility and am very impressed with the team work at this facility. I'm a physical therapist and so I am always interested in the therapy provided in particular. Their team is solid and really do an amazing job of bringing out the best in each patient they work with. They are collaborative and work to take care of the whole patient and not just the one diagnosis. Cannot wait to see the final results of their new add on and remodel. It really is impressive and such a functional set up for the patients.

  • Chuck Bosen
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I had the opportunity to meet with the leadership staff including the executive director, director of nursing, rehabilitation, wounds and community outreach to discuss their programming. This Skilled Nursing Facility has truly transformed itself. Having worked as a RN in skilled nursing for 20 years, I am familiar with standards and best practices. I must say that I am very impressed with the quality work that is happening now at Meadow View Nursing and Rehabilitation. I look forward to collaborating with them more in the future.

About Meadow View Nursing And Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameMidland Nampa Healthcare Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Limited Liability Company
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1979 (41 years)
Capacity112
Residents77
Percent Occupied69%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Meadow View Nursing And Rehabilitation

Meadow View Nursing And Rehabilitation was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Idaho Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 24, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.

November 5, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$2,340 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Meadow View Nursing And Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.2%
82.8%
82.8%
82.8%
96.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.2%
85.5%
84.6%
68.7%
95.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.0%
42.9%
44.4%
46.7%
47.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.8%
25.9%
12.3%
18.3%
19.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.2%
20.6%
11.5%
13.1%
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
33.3%
33.3%
26.8%
20.7%
17.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.6%
19.1%
20.8%
12.5%
14.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.3%
12.5%
17.2%
18.5%
5.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.8%
14.2%
3.9%
4.2%
9.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1%
2.8%
6.7%
7.5%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
3.5%
1.7%
3.3%
5.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.4%
3.5%
6.2%
4.6%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4%
1.6%
1.5%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
1.4%
4.9%
5.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7%
1.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

80.2%
87.0%
80.5%
73.5%
86.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.5%
87.0%
87.0%
87.0%
84.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.9%
62.2%
54.5%
60.8%
69.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
22.2%
19.4%
5.0%
5.0%
20.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
2.7%
0.0%
4.0%
1.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
3.5%
1.3%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017ID
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places