Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Valley Vista Care Center Of Sandpoint

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Idaho (ID)
  4. Sandpoint
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Valley Vista Care Center Of Sandpoint

General Information

Legal Business NameValley Vista Care Corporation
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1973 (44 years)
Capacity73
Residents59
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Valley Vista Care Center Of Sandpoint

Valley Vista Care Center Of Sandpoint
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Idaho Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 23, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

March 27, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 25 days
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionHonor a residents' rights as a residents of the nursing home, free of coercion and reprisal, and as citizens or residents of the United States.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Data Not Available

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3%
98.3%
98.2%
100.0%
96.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.3%
69.6%
76.2%
-
46.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.1%
22.4%
20.4%
30.2%
22.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.0%
17.0%
17.3%
11.0%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
32.1%
29.6%
33.3%
36.0%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.1%
20.5%
24.4%
24.4%
14.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.0%
9.7%
9.6%
19.6%
11.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.7%
3.6%
3.9%
0.0%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.9%
4.7%
2.6%
2.6%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
11.1%
9.3%
12.2%
10.2%
5.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.3%
10.2%
7.5%
13.0%
5.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
1.7%
7.1%
5.6%
2.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7%
1.7%
1.8%
1.9%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.3%
95.3%
97.3%
91.1%
87.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
93.0%
93.0%
93.0%
82.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
55.3%
-
66.0%
66.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
22.7%
16.7%
19.2%
25.6%
20.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016ID
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened