Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Aperion Care Burbank

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Illinois
  3. Burbank Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Ezra Ruelo
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My uncle had been at this facility for a year now and we are very happy with the care and the staff. I would recommend this to anyone looking for a place to take their loved one.

  • Maria Gonzalez
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Clean building with nice and friendly staff. My mom loves being here and we're glad we made this choice.

  • Nigel Williams
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    Is was hard deciding whether or not to put my father in a nursing home. I struggled with the decision but I'm glad I chose Aperion care Burbank. The facility is very small and clean and well maintained. I appreciate how the staff goes out of thier way to make the patients feel at home. My father's needs are met and the staff is phenomenal. I've never seen a more helpful group of people. They bend over backward to make the patients comfortable. And the nursing staff is great at keeping you Informed. I sleep well at night knowing my father is in good hands.

  • daisy tovar
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    If I can give this place a negative stars I will. PLEASE PLEASE , do not take your family members here they are the worse place you can take . My family and I had a horrible experience and will like to spread the word for people out there . I say this again DO NOT TAKE YOUR FAMILY THERE !

  • Gladys Martinez
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    This place is very disorganized. Non professional. My moms sugar was 524 and they made excuses of why it was that high. They encouraged my mom to use the bathroom on herself because they were too lazy on helping her to the bathroom. They had excuses for all of their errors. Mom's feet got very swollen because they sat her all day in a wheelchair without the feet rest. When I brought it to their attention. They said it was to strengthen their legs. I was there everyday with my mother mom for 4 days and had to take my mom home. The food is terrible too. I don't recommend this place for your loved one.

About Aperion Care Burbank

General Information

Legal Business NameExceptional Care, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 13, 1996 (22 years)
Capacity56
Residents53
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Aperion Care Burbank

Aperion Care Burbank was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 25, 2017 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.

June 23, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide food in a way that meets a resident's needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Aperion Care Burbank require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 30min
4hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

76.9%
51.0%
51.0%
50.0%
92.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.5%
-
60.0%
-
44.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.4%
9.1%
4.2%
4.5%
21.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.8%
23.0%
15.2%
10.6%
17.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
44.7%
37.8%
35.7%
21.1%
19.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.3%
9.1%
10.6%
18.6%
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.4%
4.5%
2.0%
6.8%
7.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.3%
5.4%
12.8%
8.3%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40.0%
15.4%
33.3%
39.5%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
0.0%
2.0%
4.3%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
98.0%
100.0%
100.0%
76.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
39.1%
30.0%
29.2%
29.8%
73.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
64.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.0%
-
-
11.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places