Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Norwood Crossing

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Illinois (IL)
  4. Chicago
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Ammo Clip
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    A very unique place for retirement. The staff here is Simply Amazing Juan Terrence luke Mike and as for management Debbie is amazing the nicest person I've ever met.

  • Kingsnova C
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    No help from social worker and administration for filing medicaid. Don't bother if your less than middle class. Nursing very caring while there. Had to find another home would not accept dad.

  • Lilian Gonzalez
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Very clean, staff seems fair.. Residents are friendly.

  • Katina Anderson
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

  • A Google User
    ★★★★★ 6 years ago

About Norwood Crossing

General Information

Legal Business NameNorwood Crossing Association
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 15, 1998 (19 years)
Capacity131
Residents120
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Norwood Crossing

Norwood Crossing
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 16, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.

August 13, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Norwood Crossing require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 55min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
10min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 40min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
99.0%
99.0%
99.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
99.0%
91.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.2%
95.3%
96.6%
84.4%
43.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.0%
17.6%
19.8%
13.8%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.7%
13.7%
4.6%
5.0%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
30.0%
27.7%
23.4%
20.0%
19.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.6%
4.9%
8.9%
10.5%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.9%
12.5%
9.0%
5.9%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3%
12.0%
12.9%
18.2%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.6%
8.1%
9.3%
4.3%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
7.5%
5.7%
9.1%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.3%
6.5%
4.3%
3.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
4.2%
3.2%
3.0%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.8%
5.4%
3.6%
4.6%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.4%
97.2%
97.1%
99.2%
76.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.5%
95.0%
95.0%
95.0%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.3%
68.9%
70.9%
68.5%
60.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.3%
12.9%
14.8%
14.0%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1%
3.1%
5.4%
4.6%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
2.8%
1.5%
2.6%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places