Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Schwab Rehabilitation Ctr Snu

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Illinois (IL)
  4. Chicago
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Schwab Rehabilitation Ctr Snu

General Information

Legal Business NameSchwab Rehabilitation Hospital And Care Network
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Other
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 22, 1998 (19 years)
Capacity30
Residents18
Percent Occupied60%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalYes
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Schwab Rehabilitation Ctr Snu

Schwab Rehabilitation Ctr Snu
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 6, 2016 - 18 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

April 2, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Schwab Rehabilitation Ctr Snu require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
50min
ReportedExpected
LPN
2hr 55min
1hr 35min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 60min
4hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 6hr 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
91.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
43.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
19.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.1%
96.5%
94.6%
96.4%
76.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
90.1%
90.1%
90.1%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
43.3%
37.2%
24.5%
28.7%
60.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
68.2%
67.5%
66.4%
66.4%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
1.6%
0.0%
1.2%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened