Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Smith Village

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Illinois (IL)
  4. Chicago
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Smith Village has another building (11365 Western) for seniors who cannot afford to live at the 113th place facility. They neglect the 11365 building even though the rent for a 2 bedroom is about $900 a month (it's more than double that in the 113th place facility). Don't get me wrong, it is a fair price, but they aren't attentive to these tenants as they are in the more expensive facility. The response is slow and you have to ask many times to get something done. If a senior does not have an advocate, they are ignored. And, some of the tenants don't want to complain from fear of retaliation.

  • ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    We know many who live there and they all love it there

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

About Smith Village

General Information

Legal Business NameWashington And Jane Smith Community Beverly
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 16, 1996 (21 years)
Capacity100
Residents91
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Smith Village

Smith Village
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 17, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

September 24, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Smith Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.5%
95.1%
95.1%
95.1%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.7%
98.7%
100.0%
100.0%
91.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.3%
81.8%
83.8%
75.8%
43.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.5%
23.0%
17.6%
16.2%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.2%
7.5%
16.9%
13.4%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.4%
15.6%
16.7%
14.6%
19.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9%
8.6%
14.1%
15.1%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6%
1.7%
4.9%
0.0%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.0%
14.9%
16.4%
25.0%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5%
3.2%
6.1%
1.4%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
1.4%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7%
8.1%
5.5%
1.2%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
3.9%
2.6%
1.2%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2%
2.4%
1.3%
1.0%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.4%
89.8%
87.2%
91.1%
76.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.4%
86.2%
86.2%
86.2%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
34.5%
31.9%
39.0%
54.2%
60.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
16.5%
13.8%
13.8%
15.3%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
1.4%
1.4%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places