Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rosewood Care Center Of Edwardsville

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Illinois (IL)
  4. Edwardsville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Cyle Michael Pollard
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Excellent place of employment. Great place for rehabilitation of patients!

  • Betsy Tozzini
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I don't know why I haven't done this sooner but I happy to now report that my Mom received the very best care at Rosewood. She was treated with respect and dignity every day she lived there. Every need was met...beyond belief. One male employee danced with her at night, when she couldn't sleep. Nothing creepy, just total caring. I was there one time when this transpired. Which made her day/night. All of the therapists were fantastic and helped my Mom tremendously. No unnecessary charges....total loving care is what we experienced. I am thankful for the facility and staff taking care of my Mom. I would 100% recommend this facility/home. As with all the other facilities we had been in, weekends are a little rough on the residents. Thank you for taking such wonderful care of my mother. I will appreciative forever.

  • RiDa Wo
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I never even got to view the home. I had to call multiple times just to get a person from admissions. Then when I finally spoke with Donna in admissions she was immediately rude and combative and was not helpful at all. When she asked if I would be ok for her to view the medical records, I finally told her never mind, with the horrible interaction and service received just to tour the facility, I am not comfortable putting a family member in the facility. Why would you be rude from the get go to a person getting ready to pay you thousands a month to live there?

  • Kathy Hentz
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The day to day care was satisfactory and they were very kind and helpful. I have a deep concern why we were not contacted when she was transferred from the nursing home to Anderson Hospital in Maryville. Had it not been for the caring nurse in the emergency room at the hospital calling us after an hour of her being there alone, the family would not have been there as she died. We arrived just 15 minutes before she passed away. The staff at Rosewood never did contact the family. We would like to know what happened. Christopher Hentz

  • Sierra Conrad
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My grandma there had strokes and is getting better thanks to rose wood for helping my grandma

About Rosewood Care Center Of Edwardsville

General Information

Legal Business NameBravo Care Of Edwardsville Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 20, 1995 (22 years)
Capacity116
Residents89
Percent Occupied77%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rosewood Care Center Of Edwardsville

Rosewood Care Center Of Edwardsville
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 26, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

December 3, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

March 26, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rosewood Care Center Of Edwardsville require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.8%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
62.5%
53.3%
57.9%
57.5%
43.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.7%
21.9%
21.0%
21.0%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.1%
30.3%
16.5%
36.8%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.3%
7.1%
6.9%
5.7%
19.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.0%
14.3%
19.7%
21.3%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
12.4%
3.5%
0.0%
1.6%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.1%
2.9%
11.3%
14.1%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.9%
1.8%
0.0%
1.9%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.9%
5.0%
10.1%
4.6%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
2.9%
4.2%
4.2%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
3.1%
3.7%
3.6%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
15.5%
7.1%
5.6%
9.9%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

95.6%
96.7%
98.0%
96.9%
76.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.4%
97.8%
97.8%
97.8%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.4%
62.7%
61.7%
58.0%
60.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.7%
7.9%
4.6%
3.8%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
2.3%
2.1%
1.1%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places