Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Vi At The Glen

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Illinois (IL)
  4. Glenview
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Vi At The Glen

General Information

Legal Business NameCc Lake Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 8, 2006 (10 years)
Capacity47
Residents44
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Vi At The Glen

Vi At The Glen
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 30, 2016 - 9 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.

May 14, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

June 27, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Vi At The Glen require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 55min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
97.4%
100.0%
91.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
43.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.7%
30.8%
30.0%
40.0%
22.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
20.1%
-
9.1%
7.0%
17.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.6%
28.1%
21.1%
20.0%
19.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.1%
8.3%
7.4%
8.6%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.0%
0.0%
4.4%
8.1%
5.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.2%
0.0%
8.1%
2.6%
7.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.8%
3.2%
2.7%
0.0%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.2%
6.5%
5.4%
2.6%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4%
3.1%
0.0%
5.0%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.1%
96.6%
95.7%
97.4%
76.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.7%
96.6%
96.6%
96.6%
74.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.6%
77.9%
72.5%
90.7%
60.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
22.2%
21.2%
21.4%
14.3%
14.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1%
4.8%
2.7%
3.3%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.2%
0.0%
2.9%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016IL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened