Franciscan Village
Photos
Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★
-
Jean Tebo★★★★★ 5 months agoI did volunteer work and fitness trained the sisters in the 90s I miss it everyday. It was a very heartfelt experience
-
Aracela Velazquez★★★★★ 7 months agoI am a caregiver for one of the residents, and she, as well as, her husband treat me well. As a caregiver for the elderly, I too, am learning from them. I do not regret helping out the eldery men and women. I would recommend this facility to anyone who needs it. Every one is nice.
-
Angie Rivera★★★★★ 11 months agoI'm one of the caregivers and it's a pleasure to work here. Taking priority in quality care.
-
John L★★★★★ a year agoOur Dad was a resident at Mother Theresa Home within Franciscan Village. We were very pleased with the facility, staff and level of care that was provided. He has now moved closer to family, however, I would recommend this community.
-
s0ftballfreak2 .★★★★★ 2 years agoThis is a great place, with a caring staff. If I need to move where there is assistance i would definitely move here. ? ?
About Franciscan Village
General Information
| Legal Business Name | Franciscan Communities, Inc |
| Ownership Type | Non Profit - Corporation |
| Changed Ownership In The Last 12 Months | No |
| First Accepted Medicare | April 19, 1991 (29 years) |
| Capacity | 69 |
| Residents | 109 |
| Percent Occupied | Unknown |
| Program Participation | Medicare And Medicaid |
| Resident And Family Councils | Resident |
| In Hospital | No |
| Continuing Care Retirement Community | Yes |
| Special Focus Facility | No |
| Auto Sprinkler System In Required Areas | Yes |
Ratings for Franciscan Village
Franciscan Village was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.
About Medicare Ratings | Overall Rating |
 | Health Inspections Rating |
| Quality Measures Rating |
| Staff Rating |
| RN Staff Rating |
Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes
Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years 
Compare The Number of Problems
Types of Problems at Nursing Homes
Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.
| Residents Affected | |||
| Severity of the Deficiency | Few | Some | Many |
| Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety | J | K | L |
| Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy | G | H | I |
| No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy | D | E | F |
| No actual harm with potential for minimal harm | A | B | C |
September 22, 2017 - 2 years ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | Many | Potential for Minimal Harm | Health Inspection | Allow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection. |
| D | Few | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Give proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible. |
| D | Few | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Properly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses. |
| D | Few | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Ensure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions. |
| D | Few | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Provide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident . |
| D | Few | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | 1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents. |
| D | Few | Potential for Harm | Health Inspection | Develop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property. |
March 3, 2017 - 3 years ago
| Residents Affected | Severity | Source/Type | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | Few | Potential for Harm | Complaint | Ensure that residents are safe from serious medication errors. |
Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day
Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Franciscan Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.
| 2hr 40min | 2hr 30min |
| Reported | Expected |
| CNA | |
| 40min | 35min |
| Reported | Expected |
| LPN | |
| 1hr 25min | 1hr 5min |
| Reported | Expected |
| RN | |
| 4hr 45min | 4hr 10min |
| Reported | Expected |
| Total Nursing | |
This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.
Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents
| 94.1% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 92.8% | 94.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 91.3% | 94.1% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| - | - | - | - | 44.5% | 47.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 10.0% | 25.0% | 28.6% | 13.6% | 21.6% | 22.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| - | - | - | - | 17.1% | 18.2% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 4.5% | 13.0% | 12.0% | 10.3% | 19.3% | 15.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| - | - | - | - | 14.2% | 15.0% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 13.0% | 12.5% | 4.0% | 10.0% | 7.9% | 7.1% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| - | - | - | 0.0% | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.1% | 0.0% | 4.1% | 5.6% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 18.8% | 4.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 4.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 3.3% | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents
| 97.5% | 96.7% | 97.7% | 98.7% | 76.0% | 83.1% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 90.1% | 97.6% | 97.6% | 97.6% | 73.2% | 81.0% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 60.7% | 64.0% | 60.0% | 54.5% | 64.3% | 67.5% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 2.6% | 2.6% | 1.5% | 3.3% | 11.0% | 13.7% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 3.2% | 3.8% | 3.0% | 0.6% | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% |
| Q4 2016 | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | Q3 2017 | IL | U.S. |
